Answer:
The claim is " oreos are the most popular cookie at my house". The evidence is because you said that " oreos run out twice as fast as snickerdoodles." The reasoning is because my family eats twice as many oreos than snickerdoodles.
Answer:
It is not rational
Step-by-step explanation:
Given
Required
Rational or Irrational
So, we have:
<em>The result of the product: 4.84974 is not rational because it can not be represented as a fraction of two integers.</em>
x intercept = where the function crosses the x axis (x,0)
y intercept = where the function crosses the y-axis (0,y)
A. y=7/2x-2
x intercept , replace y by 0 and solve for x:
0 =7/2x-2
2= 7/2 x
2 / (7/2) = x
x= 4/7
y-intercept, replace x by 0 and solve for y
y= 7/2x-2
y= 7/2 (0) -2
y=-2
B.
x-intercept:
x=-3
y-intercept
0=-3
It doesn't have a y-intercept.
Answer:
If we reject the null hypothesis based on the evidence, then our conclusion should be Option c.
If we do not reject the null hypothesis based on the evidence, then our conclusion should be Option a.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given that the FDA wants to set up a hypothesis test to show that the new drug is safe before approving it by assuming it to be unsafe.
So, Null hypothesis, = New drug is unsafe
Alternate Hypothesis, = New drug is safe
<em>Now, if we reject the null hypothesis based on the evidence, then our conclusion should be that : </em>
There is sufficient evidence to believe that the new drug is safe because rejecting null hypothesis means that alternate hypothesis is accepted with required evidence.
<em>And If we do not reject the null hypothesis based on the evidence, then our conclusion should be that : </em>
There is insufficient evidence to believe that the new drug is safe because not rejecting null hypothesis means that we are not ready with enough evidence to assume that new drug is safe.
Answer:
P(B and D) = 0.35
Step-by-step explanation:
It is a probability tree diagram. Here to find P(B and D):
apply method:
P(A and B) = P(A) × P(B)
Here given:
So, P(B and D):