1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
yulyashka [42]
2 years ago
13

Shakespeare’s "Sonnet 65" is a meditation on beauty, the inevitability of death, and immortality. Respond to the following quest

ion in a journal entry of about 150 words: Imagine scientists have created a medicine that allows you to live forever. They’ve offered to give it to you for free, no strings attached. Would you take it? Why or why not?
English
1 answer:
timama [110]2 years ago
8 0

If scientists made medicine to live forever with no strings attached then maybe I would take it. It depends on who it is handing me it, If it was a bad person then no but if they were good people then maybe, I would only do it if my parents told me to. Did you know Sonnet 65 is by William Shakespeare and is one of several poems that discusses time, aging, and what writing can and cannot do to fight against these forces? Shakespeare's central theme is the opposition between the transitory, delicate nature of beauty and the devastating effect on the beauty of mortality and its principal instrument, time. The opening questions seem rhetorical, indirectly arguing the poet's conviction that beauty is no match for aging and death. Again I wouldn't know what to do if doctors or scientists gave me random medicine then I don't know. I know if the medicine was important then my parents would give it to me not random scientists.

You might be interested in
Help me, please this is hard
Grace [21]

The answer is B) 6 because it doesn't have anything to do with the phalanx, which is what the passage mainly focuses on.

6 0
3 years ago
YO ANY BODY WHO IS WILLING TO DO THIS -RIGHT!- GET 100 POINTS AND BRAINLIEST
SCORPION-xisa [38]

Answer:

I have no clue but i tried

Explanation:

I have no clue but i tried

6 0
2 years ago
What’s the most effective change the writer could make to improve the coherence of this paper?
Fittoniya [83]

<span>Predictable Paragraph Organization: </span>To maintain optimal coherency, organize paragraphs in the way that readers are accustomed. For example, unless there is a compelling reason to do otherwise, place the topic sentence in the first position of the paragraph. The topic sentence appears in the first position of the paragraph 80% of the time in expository writing. Because of this high percentage, readers expect the main idea of the paragraph to be in this position. Similarly, the thesis statement appears 50% of the time as the last sentence in an essay introduction, so follow this practice as well.

Additionally, the Ancient Greeks developed the rhetorical rules for our writing, and these rules dictate that the most important idea in any communication needs to be stated first. Organize paragraphs with customary and traditional structures to be considerate to your reader.


3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is a disadvantage of speaking your ideas rather than writing them ?
makkiz [27]
If you are speaking your ideas you are practacally inviting persecution while writing them limits the amount by your choice of reserved information.
3 0
2 years ago
Think about the compromises that occurred in the United States before 1850. Do you think the solutions set forth in those compro
Illusion [34]
The following are the compromise made before the Compromise of 1850:• The Missouri Compromise: Missouri was admitted into the Union as a slave state. However,  Maine was taken away from Massachusetts and made into a non-slave state. It was done to balance out the number of slaves and non-slave states in the US.• Slave Trade Compromise: Slavery went for 20 years because of this compromise.• Connecticut Compromise: The Constitution set up two houses in Congress: the House of Representatives (proportional membership based on population) and the Senate (two seats per state). • The Three-Fifths Compromise: Slaves counted as 3/5 of a person under the Constitution for apportioning House of Representative seats.
It had brought racial discrimination to prosper for slave states. For Non-slave states. The Northerners were able to grow economically. They had railroads and had established industrialized states.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • PART A: Why is Mr. Winter's and Harriet's interaction at swim club significant to the story's plot? A Mr. Winter knows Harriet t
    14·1 answer
  • The opposite meaning or outcome from what was expected is
    7·2 answers
  • What is an objective statement?
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following sentences could not be used to represent the equation x - 4 = -13?
    11·1 answer
  • How to use quip in a sentence
    7·2 answers
  • II what way(s) are Elizabethan tragedies structurally similar to Seneca's plays? Select all that apply.
    14·1 answer
  • What dose miss Ophelia do you help Tom after her conversation with Marie
    11·1 answer
  • Shakespeare began his career writing interludes. <br> a. True<br> b. False
    11·2 answers
  • ???????????????????????????
    6·1 answer
  • Question tag of You'd like tea_______? , Sabbhya'd already finished her homework,________?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!