I think that C, that is, "they found the charge and trouble very great, and they had little or no crop it is not doubted", is your answer.
Understatement represents something as smaller or less intense than it reallly is, it presents it as less important. In sentence C, the speaker refers to a problem as a minor inconvinience "(...)trouble very great". Generarlly, we all know, that troubles are far from great. "They had little or no crop it is not doubted", you could change the focus and say that you have "some crop" instead of referring to the crop as being little.
Answer:
pictures are easier interpret than words or something along the lines
Explanation:
The correct answer is option letter B (The publisher). According to the citation style <u>MLA</u>, which has been developed by the Modern Language Association, the correct way to cite <u>a book in print with one author</u> is: Last Name, First Name. Title of Book. City of Publication: Publisher, Publication Date. In this case, the correct citation of the book would be: Bearden, Kim. <em>Crash Course: The Life Lessons My Students Taught Me</em>. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2014. Print.
In the article "Saudis Expand Regional Power as Others Falter" the author David D Kirkpatrick discusses the associate degree ironic shift from a democracy mentality back to a lucid autarchy comfort. it's believed that this paradigm shift is predicated on 2 distinctive contributors; foremost the "feebleness or near-collapse of the states around them, together with Asian nation, Egypt, Syria, Yemen, Libya, Bahrain and Tunisia" and second the perseverance as well as significant funding of the recent Saudi order (Kirkpatrick D).
It is simply an entire<span> mess." For an</span><span> absolute </span>autarchy<span> tracing its </span>family<span> roots back </span>three hundred<span> years, </span>the Asian nation<span> is taking </span>a number one<span> role </span>within the<span> struggle to reshape that mess.</span> The surprising<span> outcome of the Arab Spring, </span>that<span> once stirred hopes for the rule of law and </span>trendy<span> democracy.</span>
<span>The analysts and diplomats say, is that the </span>ascendency<span> of the Saudis </span>is essentially<span> a byproduct of the feebleness or near-collapse of </span>such a lot of<span> the states around them, </span>together with Republic of Iraq<span>, Egypt, Syria, Yemen, Libya, Bahrain, and </span>Tunisia.
<span>The Saudis </span>are shoring<span> Bahrain, and </span>are<span> fighting </span>aboard to<span /><span> support </span>the govt.<span> in </span>national capital.
<span>Billions of </span>bucks<span> from Saudi coffers </span>are<span> sustaining friendly governments in Egypt and Jordan.</span>
