Answer:
Options (A) and (C)
Step-by-step explanation:
A). The given inequality is,
x + y ≤ 2
Solution area of the inequality is the shaded area below the line.
Since (0, 0) lies in the shaded region, ordered pair will be a solution of this inequality.
B). For the inequality y ≤ 
Since, (0, 0) doesn't lie in the shaded region of this inequality, ordered pair will not be a solution of the inequality.
C). y > 
In this graph (0, 0) lies in the shaded region of the inequality therefore, it will be a solution of the given inequality.
Therefore, Options (A) and (C) are the correct options.
Answer:
K(A+B)/A
Step-by-step explanation:
K = (AB)/(A+B)
K(A+B)=AB
K(A+B)/A=B
1.
a. 12d² -6d
b. 6c^5 + 8c^4 -10c³
c. correct
2.
a. correct
b. correct
c. 12r^8-6r^4 + 9r^2, then multiply the rest by -1
3. correct
4. x² + 10
5. d=4, -1/3
Answer:
Therefore the number of brown shells in each necklace was = 2 brown shells.
Step-by-step explanation:
If Julie made identical necklaces then we can say that number of each different colored shells were equally distributed among the necklaces.
So we can say that to find the number of necklaces we have to find the GCD (greatest common denominator) of the different colored shells.
Therefore the GCD of 10, 15 and 20 is 5.
Therefore Julia made 5 necklaces.
Therefore the number of brown shells in each necklace was = 
= 2 shells.
Answer:
2019.
Step-by-step explanation:
We have been given that for the years from 2002 and projected to 2024, the national health care expenditures H, in billions of dollars, can be modeled by 
where t is the number of years past 2000.
To find the year in which national health care expenditures expected to reach $4.0 trillion (that is, $4,000 billion), we will substitute 
in our given formula and solve for t as:
Take natural log of both sides:
So in the 18.5 years after 2000 the expenditure will reach 4 trillion.
Therefore, in year 2019 national health care expenditures are expected to reach $4.0 trillion.
