100 Points - AP Macro Questions - Brainliest to Correct Answers. Wrong Answers Get Reported

Advanced Placement (AP)

2 answers:

mote1985 [20]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

Explanation:

The money supply multiplier is how much an injection of money supply, e.g. the Federal Reserve Bank lowering the reserve requirement or changing the interest rates for banks, will increase and multiply the overall money supply in the economy.

Its actual effect is always less because banks hold extra reserves and people keep some money in cash instead of depositing into the bank.

sashaice [31]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

c & d

Explanation:

You might be interested in

How to find?<br><br> AP calculus AB

KATRIN_1 [288]

Answer: B (130)
Explanation:
A trapezoidal Riemann sum can be found by multiplying the width (the change in x) of each sub interval by the average of the y values of the two points at either end of the section and then adding up all of the sun intervals. Therefore, the trapezoidal approximation would equal 0.5(40) + 1.5(50) + 1(35) to get the answer of 130.

3 0

3 years ago

Given that a solution containing analyte is yellow, what complementary color does it absorb and what is that color's approximate

Harrizon [31]

If wavelengths of light from a definite region of the spectrum are engrossed by a material, then the materials will appear to be the complementary color. If violet light with wavelength of 400nm is immersed, the material will look yellow. If the material engrosses blue you will perceive the color orange.

3 0

4 years ago

A psychologist conducted a study at her home during an annual activity of children wearing masks and going door-to-door receivin

klasskru [66]

Graph is attached.

Answer:

a) The number of children who took extra candy can be said to be the operational definition of the dependent variable here.

(The dependent variable is defined as the variable that is tested by the experimenter. The outcome of dependent variable depends on the independent variable).

b) The psychologist hypotheses are :

H1 : The children would take more candy when they were alone.

H2: The children would take more candy when they were masked.

The data does not in anyway support the hypothesis 1 of the psychologist because from the graph the percentage of children who took candy when alone was low.

The data fully supports the hypothesis 2. From the graph we could denote the percentage of children who colected additional candy when masked was higher.

c) The findings cannot be generalized to all children because only children from the psychologist's neighborhood was used in the experiment.

d) This study is not a naturalistic behaviour because the psychologist is manipulating a variable. Therefore we cannot call this study a naturalistic behaviour.

e) Modeling: Here the children's behaviour may be influenced because they may try to imitate what other children did. A child may take additional candy because another chid took additional candy.

Deindividuation: In this case, the children may feel a loss of identity or anonymous because they are in group. They may take extra candy because they feel anonymous.

From the graph, we could see the percentage of children in group who took extra candy was higher than the percentage of chidren alone who took extra candy.

Lawrence Kohlberg’s preconventional stage: A child's behaviour may be influenced by his self interest to gain reward. This may make the child not collect extra candy.

This Lawrence Kohlberg’s preconventional stage may also influence the behaviour of the children as the children may also be afraid of punishment, which may result in them not collecting extra candy