1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
DiKsa [7]
3 years ago
9

PLZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ HELPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP I BEGGING YOU THIS

Social Studies
1 answer:
marishachu [46]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Most of the settled lands of Canada, in Ontario, Manitoba, Saskatchewan, and Alberta, were transferred from First Nations to the Crown (the Government) through treaties.   Today both sides agree that the so-called Indian Treaties are agreements between the Crown (the Government) and First Nations, in which the First Nations exchanged some of their interests in specific areas of their ancestral lands in return for various kinds of payments and promises from Crown officials. However, each side has a different interpretation of what was intended by the agreements. The Canadians (British) and the First Nations were at the same meetings, listened to the same speeches (translated) and signed the same pieces of paper. Yet they had (and still have) two totally different concepts of what the treaties were about, and what each side was promising. The differences in understanding are rooted in two totally different world views, and two totally different concepts of land ownership, and two colliding purposes. The concept of private ownership of land by an individual, who could build a fence and keep others out forever, was totally foreign to First Nations people. First Nations had an oral tradition. They passed down important information by the spoken word during important ceremonies and at celebrations. What was said was what was important to them, not what was written on paper. Though they did not have a written tradition, in the European sense, they recorded important events by sewing beaded wampum belts. Wampum belts signifying treaties became sacred objects that were brought out at certain times, Then elders recited the terms and understandings of the agreement commemorated by that ceremonial wampum belt. The Government View of Treaties The First Nations View of Treaties The British and Canadian governments saw treaties as a way to legalize the ceding of Indian lands to clear the way for European settlement, mining, and railways. Treaties were intended to extinguish all First Nations claims and rights to their land forever, except in those lands set apart as Reserves of land for the bands to live on.   In return, the government would make a one-time payment to the bands, plus a specified annual sum. As well, treaties had terms dealing with hunting and fishing rights, as well as education and health care. Treaties were also intended to offer the Indians some protection from the consequences of new settlement, and some assistance in adapting to new ways of living as the old ways became less feasible. Treaties were also expected to be the first step towards assimilation. Government expected First Nations people to give up their culture, including their customs, their language, their religious beliefs, their ceremonies, and everything else that differentiated them from Canadians of British origin. also Nations saw treaties in a different light. To them, treaties were solemn pacts establishing the future basis of relations between their people, for whom Canada is an ancient homeland, and the new Government of Canada and its people and Nations representatives signed the treaties to ensure that they would receive some government assistance in the future to ensure the survival of their people. They believed (because all the Treaty Commissioners told them so) that they would be cherished and protected by the Crown with whom they had a special relationship.  

Explanation:

Hope this helps :)

You might be interested in
In the Webster-Hayne debate, Robert Y. Hayne believed that?
Molodets [167]
I think the answer is B but I could be wrong
4 0
3 years ago
Why would a country want to erect trade barriers such as tariffs or quotas?
Alex
Im thinking the answer would be D
8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Buddhism is the native religion of Japan, and focuses on the innate goodness of man, worship of ancestors, and passage of life c
Natali [406]

FALSE Buddhism is the native religion of Japan, and focuses on the innate goodness of man, worship of ancestors, and passage of life celebrations.

Buddhism is the native faith of Japan, and makes a speciality of the innate goodness of man, worship of ancestors, and passage of lifestyles celebrations. The Edo length was characterised through loads of years of isolation and relative peace without the have an effect on of Western artwork and tradition.

The charango is one in all Peru maximum loved Andean instruments. even though the stringed tool is critical to musical patterns across the entire continent, the Peruvian charango has a unique construct.

Buddhism is one of the world's biggest religions and originated years ago in India. Buddhists consider that the human existence is certainly one of struggling, and that meditation, religious and physical hard work, and proper conduct are the methods to acquire enlightenment, or nirvana.

Learn more about Buddhism here:-brainly.com/question/8920497

#SPJ4

8 0
2 years ago
If you enter an intersection or railroad and get stuck because of all the cars in front of you, you have violated California's _
Georgia [21]
Anti Gridlock Law is your answer
3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Photography is demonstrably the most contemporary of art forms. It is the most vital, effective, and universal means of communic
Leona [35]

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

It is demonstrably the most effective form of depleting art works.

Pictures speaks a thousands words and gives various meanings to things and understanding based on the different in cultural background and mentality of the public.

It is the most effective form of communication of facts and ideas because people tend to a see a picture or a portrait that speaks different meaning.

It is a universal means of communication because you can pass a message to someone through art work like photography since every body on earth has different languages. So therefore, i agree with the statement above about photography.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Probability of of a rolling a number thats not composite on a 6 sided die?
    6·1 answer
  • Some positions in county government are appointed and some are elected. Compare and contrast these two ways of attaining a gover
    9·2 answers
  • Who led Israelites out of Egypt and into the Sinai desert?
    15·1 answer
  • What is the protection of an inventor's idea called in the legislative branch called?
    8·1 answer
  • What two (2) variables affect the amount of time you spend in the CDM process?
    11·1 answer
  • In 1929, the great depression began in the united states, caused mainly by the stock market crash. what was a major cause of the
    13·2 answers
  • How was Georgia impacted by the French and Indian War?
    5·1 answer
  • What happened during the Ming dynasty?
    6·1 answer
  • Imagine you attend a Carnival. Describe in at least a paragraph (5 sentences) what you would see, hear, and experience there. Be
    7·1 answer
  • Using a calendar year as an analogy to the geologic time scale, when do the oldest anatomically modern humans appear on earth?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!