Answer:
Boundaryless organization
Explanation:
A Boundaryless is one which is aimed at enhancing flexibility such that all stakeholders have reasonable amount of freedom to work together for the good of the organization. The removal of all forms of barriers including those between employees and consumers which could at times reduce flexibility and effectiveness are eliminated, hence allowing managers and employees who are close to the problem at hand and have better knowledge of the sutuation make calls thereby saving time and input. Boundaryless organizations show great level adaption to cahages in environmental and technological practices which has accelerated business in the 21st century.
Efforts to discourage teenagers from smoking and efforts to encourage smokers to quit is an example of primary prevention.
Preventive measures encompass a wide range of "interventions" aimed at reducing hazards or threats to health. The primary, secondary, and tertiary categories of prevention might have come about in conversations between researchers and medical experts.
Primary prevention aims to thwart disease or injury before it even begins. To achieve this, dangerous or unhealthy habits must be changed, exposure to dangers that can cause disease or injury must be reduced, and resistance to disease or damage, should exposure occur, must be strengthened.
Learn more about primary prevention here:
brainly.com/question/2346282
#SPJ4
Triangle trade<span>, is a historical term indicating </span>trade<span> among three ports or regions. Triangle t</span>rade<span> usually evolves when a region has export commodities that are not supposed in the region from which its major imports come. It's on bing </span>
Answer:
(B) Led to the "one-person, one-vote" judicial doctrine - Prohibited oddly-shaped majority-minority districts
Explanation:
Baker v. Carr (1961) is a Supreme Court case concerning equality in voting districts. Decided in 1962, the ruling established the standard of "one person, one vote" and opened the door for the Court to rule on districting cases.
Shaw v. Reno (1993) In 1991, a group of white voters in North Carolina challenged the state's new congressional district map, which had two “majority-minority” districts. The group claimed that the districts were racial gerrymanders that violated the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. In its 1993 decision, the Supreme Court agreed, ruling that race cannot be the predominant factor in creating districts.
