I believe the answer is :<span>The historian is placing the argument in historical context.
Argument with historical context would tried to explain a certain historical event based on </span>the social, political, religious, and economic conditions that existed during a certain time and place.In the example above, the historian choose to base her argument on religious conditions in the past.
Cold war means war without armed conflict. it was between USA and USSR . USA wanted the world to adopt capitalism while USSR wanted the world to adopt communism. In this way the relationships between the two superpowers were not good. Both build sophisticated nuclear weapons. USA send it's forces into Vietnam but north Vietnam supported communism. Also known as the Vietnam war, USSR won . Then USSR send it's forces into Afghanistan but USA supported Afghanistan and provided them with weopans. USA won the war in Afghanistan and the USSR broke
Answer:The Ratification of the Conventions of nine States, shall be sufficient for the Establishment of this Constitution between the States so ratifying the Same.
Explanation:
Members of American colonial society argued the position of "no taxation without representation", starting with the Stamp Act Congress in 1765. They rejected the authority of the British Parliament to tax them because they lacked members in that governing body. Protests steadily escalated to the Boston Massacre in 1770 and the burning of the Gaspee in Rhode Island in 1772, followed by the Boston Tea Party in December 1773, during which Patriots destroyed a consignment of taxed tea.
Women formed labor unions to fight workplace discrimination.
Hope this helps!
