D because he/she can't change the majority opinion by making a new law or making a letter to the president etc... she can only write why she/he does not agree with the majority.
I think that it is the 2 because king Henry Bowers wives are not part of the direct cause of the revolution and I don’t think it was one orthree either
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.
The most valid counter-argument to the description of the Mongols by the Russian duke was that the Mongols were interested only in plunder and treasure but not in controlling the Russian territory.
As we know by reading this part of history, the Mongols were terrible warriors that showed no mercy. They were fierce fighters that indeed were interested in destroying and plunder. And more than conquering and establish a form of government to rule a territory, by the way, they attacked and proceeded, it seemed that they were more interested in becoming wealthy.
The correct answer should be an implicit idea found in things such as allegories. It's like watching a fable, it's not really about the animals but rather it has a meaning that is understood by us and that is implicit, not explicitly said. Implicit ideas are common and are used in almost all works of art, from writing to painting to sculpting.
