Answer: <em>Apache were not receiving guns from the Spanish. Which of the following Oklahoma place names is evidence of the Spanish influence on the land?</em>
If need more help google it UwU!!
That is if I didn´t help!!
One big reason: It gave the North an additional, powerful reason to fight and win the war.
Additional reasons: It gave the Union Army another source of soldiers, and it kept foreign powers from allying with the Confederacy.
<u>Historical context/details</u>:
President Abraham Lincoln issued The Emancipation Proclamation as an executive order on January 1, 1863. The executive order declared freedom for slaves in ten Confederate states in rebellion against the Union. It also allowed that freed slaves could join the Union Army to fight for the cause of reuniting the nation and ending slavery. As summarized by the Historical Society of Pennsylvania, "The Proclamation broadened the goals of the Union war effort; it made the eradication of slavery into an explicit Union goal, in addition to the reuniting of the country."
While Lincoln personally was strongly against slavery, he had to tread carefully in his role as president and commander-in-chief. The Emancipation Proclamation was carefully worded in order to retain the support of four border slave states, which remained in the Union though they were states that permitted slavery, were Maryland, Missouri, Delaware, and Kentucky. Lincoln wanted to keep those states loyal to the Union cause.
The Emancipation Proclamation was also a way of blocking foreign support for the Confederate cause. According to the American Battlefield Trust, "Britain and France had considered supporting the Confederacy in order to expand their influence in the Western Hemisphere. However, many Europeans were against slavery." Britain had abolished slavery in its territories in 1833. France had put a final end to slavery in its territories in 1848. So when Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation on January 1, 1863, it also served as a foreign policy action to keep European powers out of the US Civil War, according to Steve Jones, professor of history at Southwestern Adventist University.
Answer:
Yes after the world war 2 the USA WAS LOST HALF OF THE AREA BECAUSE THE WAR WAS HAPPENED IN USA ONLY THAT TIME THE RUSSIA WAS THROW SOME BOMBS IN USA THAT TIME IN THAT AREA SOME HOUSES AND PEOPLE WAS NOT DIED THEY ARE EXPECTING BUT IN THAT AREA THE PIECE OF MAN ALSO NOT THERE AND THE WAR PLEASE ALSO SOME COLLAPSED THAT TIME THE RUSSIA WAS DEVELOPING MORE IN THEIR COUNTRY AND THEY FIRST IN THE GROWTH
When President Roosevelt said on December 7, 1941 that the date would live in infamy he meant that the day would be remembered as a dishonorable and disgraceful day in American history do to the large loss of life from the Pearl Harbor attacks. Therefore, out of these words Roosevelt was equating the attacks to being done in manner that could be equated with "dishonor."
In my opinion, I believe Rockefeller came out with the better deal because Rockefeller's success with Vanderbilt provided him an advantage over others.
hope this helps:))
