The skepticism about the empire of Ghana and the accounts for it is nothing weird because the majority of what is written about it is from two people from the same place, that had totally different views and interpretations on the things, and came from different culture.
Very often in the historical text, the people that wrote something have been very subjective, not objective. Thus the writings of these two Arab geographers can be very misleading, as they described what they saw with their own eyes, but also with using their own perception. That has proven numerous times to give very inaccurate depictions of a society and culture, like the depictions of the Romans for the Celts, or of the Greeks for the Scythian female warriors that they named Amazons.
There's only one point of view unfortunately, and it is always much more reliable when multiple writings are available from people from multiple different backgrounds, or the best scenario if it is writings from the people in question.
Weimar Constitution adopted in Germany
B. South Texas
due to the fact of the coastal area and the border which creates a economic Core Area
The Americans hostility towards the clergy, adherents, and the Catholic Church during the 1800s was rooted to their desires to maintain the white, Protestant nation. The reform even led to religious discrimination and violence. Therefore, the answer to this question is most probably letter D.
Answer:
Elisabeth most likely lived in the 19th century.
Explanation:
Considering the following historical elements:
-Development of anaesthetics in 1847 by James Simpson,
-Robert Koch discovered that diseases were caused by microorganisms around the 1880s
Also, taking into consideration that by that time, vaccines had already been produced such as the first smallpox vaccine in 1798.
