1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
aleksandrvk [35]
3 years ago
6

March all that apply: History.

History
2 answers:
den301095 [7]3 years ago
3 0
First one is secede second one is civil war 3rd one is popular soveignority and 4th is emancipation proclamation
ololo11 [35]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:the 1st one would be secede second: would be civil war third:popular sovereignty fourth:emancipation proclamation

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Based on the table shown here, what can you say about immigration between 1820 and 1850?
Andrei [34K]
............I don’t see a table.........
3 0
3 years ago
Which statement most accurately describes the practices of people who took part in the oracle bone ritual?
weqwewe [10]

the correct answer is D.

3 0
3 years ago
How many years passed from the time Virginia was settled until the pilgrims reached Plymouth rock
SpyIntel [72]

Answer:

The native inhabitants of the region around Plymouth Colony were the various tribes of the Wampanoag people, who had lived there for some 10,000 years before the Europeans arrived. Soon after the Pilgrims built their settlement, they came into contact with Tisquantum, or Squanto, an English-speaking Native American.

Explanation:

Hope this helps :)

7 0
3 years ago
Japanese feudalism differs from European feudalism because.
madreJ [45]

Answer:

C. Japanese feudalism lasted much longer than the European system

Explanation:

The Japanese feudal system lasted until the 19th century. It ended with the fall of the shogunate regime that had been going on since the early 17th century. The new historical era is the Meiji Era, in which Japan quickly modernized and industrialized, adopting Western models. In Europe, feudalism existed roughly until the 15th century.

8 0
3 years ago
1. How does the author characterize the
nexus9112 [7]

Answer:s the United States enters the 21st century, it stands unchallenged as the world’s economic leader, a remarkable turnaround from the 1980s when many Americans had doubts about U.S. “competitiveness.” Productivity growth—the engine of improvement in average living standards—has rebounded from a 25-year slump of a little more than 1 percent a year to roughly 2.5 percent since 1995, a gain few had predicted.

Economic engagement with the rest of the world has played a key part in the U.S. economic revival. Our relatively open borders, which permit most foreign goods to come in with a zero or low tariff, have helped keep inflation in check, allowing the Federal Reserve to let the good times roll without hiking up interest rates as quickly as it might otherwise have done. Indeed, the influx of funds from abroad during the Asian financial crisis kept interest rates low and thereby encouraged a continued boom in investment and consumption, which more than offset any decline in American exports to Asia. Even so, during the 1990s, exports accounted for almost a quarter of the growth of output (though just 12 percent of U.S. gross domestic product at the end of the decade).

Yet as the new century dawns, America’s increasing economic interdependence with the rest of the world, known loosely as “globalization,” has come under attack. Much of the criticism is aimed at two international institutions that the United States helped create and lead: the International Monetary Fund, launched after World War II to provide emergency loans to countries with temporary balance-of-payments problems, and the World Trade Organization, created in 1995 during the last round of world trade negotiations, primarily to help settle trade disputes among countries.

The attacks on both institutions are varied and often inconsistent. But they clearly have taken their toll. For all practical purposes, the IMF is not likely to have its resources augmented any time soon by Congress (and thus by other national governments). Meanwhile, the failure of the WTO meetings in Seattle last December to produce even a roadmap for future trade negotiations—coupled with the protests that soiled the proceedings—has thrown a wrench into plans to reduce remaining barriers to world trade and investment.

For better or worse, it is now up to the United States, as it has been since World War II, to help shape the future of both organizations and arguably the course of the global economy. A broad consensus appears to exist here and elsewhere that governments should strive to improve the stability of the world economy and to advance living standards. But the consensus breaks down over how to do so. As the United States prepares to pick a new president and a new Congress, citizens and policymakers should be asking how best to promote stability and growth in the years ahead.

Unilateralism

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did betty friedan and gloria steinem contribute to the feminist movement during the 1960s and 1970s?
    10·1 answer
  • What caused the U.S. to get involved in WWII?
    9·1 answer
  • It is possible that he consumed here the last of his food store: a piece of tough dried ibex meat. Two bone splinters had inadve
    12·2 answers
  • The "generation gap" in the late 1960s was between
    14·2 answers
  • Why did the soviets have the advantage at the battle of stalingrad
    13·1 answer
  • How many terms did john quincy adams serve as president
    6·2 answers
  • How did climate change affect people in ancient history?
    11·2 answers
  • What was unique about the Battle of New Orleans in the War of 1812?
    12·1 answer
  • why was there's so much controversy around the 2000 election how did the electoral college figure in this how does the selection
    7·1 answer
  • Message they give us....MATTHEW 22: 37-39 ... pleasee :)
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!