Answer:
Explanation:
Sadly, brainly has taken away to inbox people, only mods can give a inbox message
Answer/Explanation:
The logical fallacy presented is an ad hominem. The statement tries to prove that voting yes on stadium tax will make you a good person. Those of the opposing argument would have been "unloyal" citizens. This argument proves feelings rather than facts making it an ad hominem.
The phrase, "Voting on the stadium tax is the duty of every loyal citizen" is a true statement. However, adding voting "yes," specifies it to one side. The author then takes it a step further stating "in fact, it is the test of whether you are a good neighbor." In the long run, this implies that if you vote against us, you are a bad person.
<span>The correct answer is D - the main action a writer takes when proofreading is fixing errors. This a moment during the writing process when an author reads the writing again and tries to find grammatical and spelling mistakes that may have snuck their way into the text. It is very important to fix those mistakes before handing it over to a publisher, because nobody wants an unfinished text.</span>
Answer:
Look at explanation:
Explanation:
If somebody doesn't have much wealth they're ability of food and new clothing will go down this is affecting their human rights. Because there is a right to new and warm clothing to suit the weather and you are not able to have that because of your wealth and wealth equals power so you aren't even able to have good power to control what you or others around you do. If somebody is poor they might go in a state to start to beg and this will lower their dignity and money = power so their power will drop drastically as well.
