1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sphinxa [80]
3 years ago
7

Using complete sentences, discuss the most important features of features of Common law.

History
1 answer:
sergij07 [2.7K]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The most important feature of a common law system is that every permutation of the law is not codified. Unlike some systems where each thing that is illegal is written out, in a common law system the law advances based on the binding decisions of judges and not by small laws made by the legislatures

You might be interested in
What is not a reason given in the article as to why the Soviet Union continuing to gain power was a problem for the United State
fenix001 [56]

Answer:

<em>Hello There Again. the correct Answer B. </em><u><em>Soviet Union seeks to spread a "fanatic" belief in communism, which is opposite the beliefs of the United States.</em></u>

Explanation:

Because The concept of "socialism in one country" was conceived by Stalin in his struggle against Leon Trotsky and his concept of permanent revolution. In 1924, Trotsky published his pamphlet Lessons of October in which he stated that socialism in the Soviet Union would fail because of the backward state of economic development unless a world revolution began. Stalin responded to Trotsky's pamphlet with his article, "October and Comrade Trotsky's Theory of Permanent Revolution". In it, Stalin stated, that he did not believe an inevitable conflict between the working class and the peasants would take place, further adding that "socialism in one country is completely possible and probable". Stalin held the view common amongst most Bolsheviks at the time; there was possibility of real success for socialism in the Soviet Union despite the country's backwardness and international isolation. While Grigoriy Zinoviev, Lev Kamenev and Nikolai Bukharin, together with Stalin, opposed Trotsky's theory of permanent revolution, they diverged on how socialism could be built. According to Bukharin, Zinoviev and Kamenev supported the resolution of the 14th Conference (held in 1925) which stated that "we cannot complete the building of socialism due to our technological backwardness." Despite the rather cynical attitude, Zinoviev and Kamenev did believe that a defective form of socialism could be constructed. At the 14th Conference, Stalin reiterated his position, claiming that socialism in one country was feasible despite the capitalist blockade of the country. After the conference, Stalin wrote "Concerning the Results of the XIV Conference of the RCP(b)", in which he stated that the peasantry would not turn against the socialist system because he believed they had a self-interest in preserving.[43] The contradictions which would arise with the peasantry during the socialist transition, Stalin surmised, could "be overcome by our own efforts". He concluded that the only viable threat to socialism in the Soviet Union was a military intervention.

In late 1925, Stalin received a letter from a party official which stated that his position of "Socialism in One Country" was in contradiction with Friedrich Engels own writings on the subject. Stalin countered, stating that Engels' writings 'reflected' "the era of pre-monopoly capitalism, the pre-imperialist era when there were not yet the conditions of an uneven, abrupt development of the capitalist countries." From 1925 onwards, Bukharin began writing extensively on the subject, and in 1926, Stalin wrote On Questions of Leninism, which contained his best-known writings on the subject. Trotsky, with the publishing of Leninism, began countering Bukharin's and Stalin's arguments, claiming that socialism in one country was possible, but only in the short-run, and claimed that without a world revolution it would be impossible to safeguard the Soviet Union from the "restoration of bourgeoisie relations". Zinoviev on the other hand, disagreed with both Trotsky and Bukharin and Stalin, holding instead steadfast to Lenin's own position from 1917 to 1922, and continued to claim that only a defecting form of socialism could be constructed in the Soviet Union without a world revolution. Bukharin, by now, began arguing for the creation of an autarkic economic model, while Trotsky, in contrast, claimed that the Soviet Union had to participate in the international division of labour to develop. In contrast to Trotsky and Bukharin, Stalin did not believe a world revolution was possible, claiming in 1938 that a world revolution was in fact impossible, and claiming that Engels was wrong on the matter. At the 18th Congress, Stalin took the theory to its inevitable conclusion, claiming that the communist mode of production could be conceived in one country. He rationalised this by claiming that the state could exist in a communist society, as long as the Soviet Union was encircled by capitalism. However, surprisingly, with the establishment of socialist regimes in Eastern Europe, Stalin claimed that socialism in one country was only possible in a large country like the Soviet Union, and that the other states, in order to survive, had to follow the Soviet line.

6 0
3 years ago
What were the causes of Scientific Revolution?
In-s [12.5K]

Answer:

The Renaissances encouraged curiosity, investigation, discovery, modern day knowledge. Caused people to question old beliefs. During the era of the Scientific Revolution, people began using experiments and mathematics to understand mysteries.

Hope this helps!!!

5 0
3 years ago
“By virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the statutes, and as a prerequisite to the successful conduct o
Amanda [17]
C) the creation of the fair employment practices committee
5 0
3 years ago
Write a short paragraph about your knowledge of India. Describe its location, language,
vivado [14]

Answer:

Explanation:

India is a country located in Asia, often seen mistakenly seen as a poor country and stereotyped. In reality it has great culture and celebrate many holidays to honor everyday things such as Holi, celebration of colors or Diwali the celebration of lights. It has great history, and was long ago took over by the British after the Sepoy rebellion when they lost control India ended up divided, two major countries that stand out from that division is mainland India and Pakistan. Today in India the language spoken most commonly is Hindi but others such as Gujarati, Tamil, Punjabi are all used. Most people their are Hindu but Shikisam, Buddhism, and Islam occupy India as well. Amanda should not of assumed India is similar to China. Not only is this not true but this assumption puts all Asian countries together. These are stereotypes that are not true. Her assumption was the equivalent of saying America and Europe are the same we very well know they are not.

3 0
4 years ago
Henry Ford's use of the assembly line in the production of automobiles led directly to
Svetllana [295]
A decrease in the cost of automobiles.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Pompey Crassus and Julius composed the
    13·1 answer
  • Who helped found Maryland as a safe place for Catholics?
    10·1 answer
  • What happened at the 1968 Democratic Convention
    9·2 answers
  • Henry Ford made many important contributions to the auto industry. Which of the following was not one of his innovations?
    13·2 answers
  • In Mexican art and music the Mexican Revolution is often
    10·1 answer
  • How did advertising industry impact America?
    14·1 answer
  • Who did not believe slavery should be abolished
    12·2 answers
  • How did the monarchs of Europe react to the French Revolution?
    15·2 answers
  • O
    7·1 answer
  • 1. What did Washington believe was a danger to the U.S. political system? (need 2)
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!