The above question wants to assess your ability to read and interpret speeches. In that case, I can't write the text for you, but I'll show you how to do it.
First, you should read Nixon's and Ford's speeches. In this reading, you should identify the objective of the speeches, that is, what Nixon and Ford want to achieve with the themes and topics presented in their speech.
Once you recognize these goals, you can write your text as follows:
- Introduce the main subject of your text.
- Show the objective of Nixon's speech and how that objective is developed during the speech.
- Show the objective of Ford's speech and how that objective is developed during the speech.
- Compare Nixon and Ford speech objectives, show similarities and differences.
- Also, compare the development of this theme and which development was most efficient.
- Show which speech was most likely to achieve the goal.
More information:
brainly.com/question/2285439?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
It is dramatic irony, blind people cannot see so they will never see these emojis
Answer:
Develop a reading habit. Vocabulary building is easiest when you encounter words in context. ...
Use the dictionary and thesaurus. ...
Play word games. ...
Use flashcards. ...
Subscribe to “word of the day” feeds. ...
Use mnemonics. ...
Practice using new words in conversation.
"I'll look like a pauper."
"She was one of those pretty and charming girls born, as though fate had blundered over her, into a family of artisans."
"Foret you"
Answer:
Speech Segmentation.
Explanation:
'Speech segmentation' is demonstrated as the process of identifying and recognizing the affiliation between the words, phonemes, as well as syllables employed in specific spoken language. It focuses on the context and emphasizes their study as a whole in order to promote a lexical meaning.
In the given situation, Carlos was incapable of '<u>speech segmentation</u>' as he could not understand the lexical and contextual meaning of the phrase and failed to understand its meaning as a whole. Therefore, <u>since he read the words in isolation and not as a whole, he was inefficient in 'speech-segmentation'. </u>
