<span>The sentence which best describes Paine's claim in the excerpt is God would defend the American colonists' fight because their cause was upright. In the beginning of the excerpt, the author says he believes that God is fair and will never give up his loyal people. The last lines point out that God knows what justice is, so there is no way to help such murderers as Britain because they did not even deserved it.</span>
The answer to this is symbol because symbol stands for an abstract idea such as an idea, quality, concept or condition.
The type of context that is different for both these two children is the social context.
<h3>What is Context?</h3>
In literature, context may be defined as the setting within which a work of writing is situated. It provides clarity and respective meaning to the intended message.
Social context illustrates the physical environment around us that can influence the way we behave and think literally.
The context of this question illustrates the situation of two different children from two different family backgrounds. One is living in an urban area with six older siblings, while the other is the only child living in a rural area.
Therefore, the type of context that is different for both these two children is the social context.
To learn more about Social contexts, refer to the link:
brainly.com/question/4066509
#SPJ1
Speare has been more feted in print than ever, in the mainstream as well as in the overflowing and sometimes murky underground river of academic publications. "Enough!" we may well cry (as we sometimes cry at the unending proliferation of productions of the plays). Not, however, in the case of Sir Frank Kermode, whose profoundly conceived and elegantly executed Shakespeare's Language (2000) was a complex but luminous contribution to the understanding of the greatest single body of dramatic work in any language, one of the most refreshing in recent times; any new commentary from him on the subject is eagerly awaited. Despite a brief flirtation with structuralism, he is no grand theorist. Instead, he is that rather old-fashioned phenomenon: a
