2 years ago

, was the cost of the war higher for the North or the South?

1 answer:

6 0

Answer:

The cost of the Civil War was much higher for the South. Most of the fighting took place in the south which took a higher toll financially. Besides, most of the factories and rail lines were in the north which made it easier to get supplies and food to Union troops.

Explanation:

The south was finanicaly destroyed during the war. When the war was over they had to rebuild from the ground up, could no longer relay on cheap slave labor to work the fields of he cash crops.

You might be interested in

Which two groups most helped the freedmen during the reconstruction era?

mote1985 [20]

Radical Republicans and Carpetbaggers

3 0

2 years ago

PLZ HELP BEING TIMED!!!!!!!!

valkas [14]

Answer: By sending letters or having gatherings

Explanation:

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

In the late nineteenth century, the agricultural credit system in the South encouraged farmers

Zinaida [17]

A, because cotton was one of if not the most expensive thing you could grow on a farm. That’s why it’s called a cash crop, and it made plantation owners unbelievably rich.

5 0

2 years ago

How did the triangles of trade function among the americas, europe, and africa?

earnstyle [38]

Americas: establishments of plantations drew Africa and slavery into the heart of the transatlantic economy.

8 0

3 years ago

Which action would most likely result in the greatest increase in the power of the executive branch??

Marysya12 [62]

This depends on ones interpretation. Our government has set up a system of checks and balances, each branch can override another.There are three branches <span>of government: executive, legislative, and judicial.The legislature enacts</span>

5 0

2 years ago