Answer:
Null hypothesis: <em>μ₁</em> = <em>μ₂</em>.
Alternate hypothesis: <em>μ₁</em> > <em>μ₂</em>.
Step-by-step explanation:
The experimenter want to see whether laboratory rats would, on average, eat more when confined to a crowded cage or an uncrowded one.
(1)
The null hypothesis for this test is defined as:
<em>H</em>₀: The rats would, on average, not eat more when confined to a crowded cage or an uncrowded one, i.e. <em>μ₁</em> = <em>μ₂</em>.
(2)
The alternate hypothesis will be directional. This is because the experimenter wants to determine whether the rats eat more or not.
So the alternate hypothesis is:
<em>H</em>ₐ: The rats would, on average, eat more when confined to a crowded cage or an uncrowded one, i.e. <em>μ₁</em> > <em>μ₂</em>.
Answer:
1, 2, 3
Step-by-step explanation:
solve the inequality by dividing both sides by 2, hence
n ≤ 3
3 = 3 and 1, 2 < 3
hence 1, 2 and 3 all make the inequality true
Answer:
D. 192 in²
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
x = 5 or x = 1
Step-by-step explanation:
x² - 6x + 7 = 0
x² - 6x = -7
x² - 6x + 9 = -7 + 9 1/2 of the x term than square it and add it the both sides.
(x - 3)(x - 3) = 2
( x -3)² = 2
= 
(x - 3) = ± 2
x - 3 = 2 or x - 3 = -2
x = 5 or x = 1
