The correct answer to this open question is the following.
I am going to take into consideration the 1st. Amendment to the United States Constitution.
It is true that the federal government must often balance protecting individual liberties and providing for order and security. We have seen how, at times, priority is given to one over the other, depending on the circumstances.
However, according to my thinking and belief systems, the federal government should always place more emphasis on protecting individual liberties. Just when the exceptional case is necessary, then the federal government must provide for order and security.
As stated in the 1st. Amendment, citizens must always have their freedom of speech and freely express what they believe is right; this includes reasonable critics of the economic and political systems, as well as to highlight positive attributes too.
Respecting the differences has always been a trademark for true democracies.
It is understandable that in times of conflict, as was the case of WWI and WWII, the government has put restrictions on certain liberties.
Some would say that the September 11 attacks justify the creation of the type of surveillance the government placed on the citizens, but that is when a fine line was crossed between protection and "espionage" without the consent of the citizens.
Answer:
1 and 4
Explanation:
The fact that adolescents don't see their parents as an absolute authority isn't related to emotional autonomy,, it's related to the duel of the ideal parents. If Adolescents interact with their parents as peers it's because of the same. The idealized figure of their parents has disappeared, so they feel like interacting with them as if they were members of the same group. Number 5 is a reflection of their need to belong to certain group.
That the government failed to articulate the completely and diversity of the American public
