In this question the options are not given; here are the options.
Select the word from the drop-down menu that can be used in place of the phrase "read between the lines to figure out" in this sentence.
A.Infer
B.Inquire
C.Verify
D.Differentiate
The answer to this question is A. Infer
Explanation:
Infer as part of reading implies analyzing the explicit details and information to understand the real meaning. This implies by inferring the reader can better understand a text and grasp all the ideas the author conveys especially implicit ones. This process is also known as reading between lines because the reader needs to get the hidden meaning or ides, which are "between lines" or can be get through a deep examination of ideas in lines. In this context, the term "read between lines" can be replaced by the word "infer."
The Declaration was intended for a wide audience and is written in a more powerful, persuasive style. The Bill of Rights was intended as a legal document while the Declaration carried no legal significance. The Bill of Rights was intended for delegates and lawmakers and is written in a more precise, technical style.
Answer:
A certain cool-headedness had come to him;
[D]oggedly he swam in that direction, swimming with slow, deliberate strokes, conserving his strength.
Explanation:
These details 'a certain..him', '[D]oggedly...strength' from the narration display that Rainsford sensible and rational person who has the ability to do well in dangerous moments. <u>The qualities of being 'cool-headed', 'swimming with the slow', and the ability to 'conserve his strength through deliberate strokes' clearly reflect that he is a calm and composed individual who can conquer the dangers and difficulties</u> coming his way through his astute and rationality. The phrases 'he wrestled with all his power', 'he struck out with strong strokes', 'struggled up to the surface and tried to cry out' substantiate the above claim.
While you are proofreading the text for grammar mistakes, you could evaluate the text by asking yourself the following questions.
What is the main idea?
What is the writer trying to say?
What rhetorical devices does the author use?
Did the writer organize his essay so that the reader will not be confused?
Was the writer able to bring about his point?
Did the introduction help start off the essay?
Did the writer conclude appropriately?
Did the writer use appropriate transitions to link ideas?
It will be hard evaluating and proofreading an essay at the same time as humans cannot multitask. I suggest doing them both separately.
