I believe it’s D ! I did some research and D seems like the only logical answer.
Answer:
in hopes on relieving pressure on war-torn Virg*nia
Answer:
The correct answer is C) Slaves who heard of Congressional support of the Missouri Compromise were encouraged to revolt.
The other options of the question were A) The Missouri Compromise encouraged slaves sold to Missouri families to revolt and run away before they could arrive in the controversial state. B) The Missouri Compromise encouraged slaves to resist revolution in the hopes that those against slavery would soon abolish it in the United States. D) Slaves who heard of Congressional opposition to the Missouri Compromise were encouraged to revolt.
The Missouri Compromise and slave revolution interact within the text in that "Slaves who heard of Congressional support of the Missouri Compromise were encouraged to revolt."
The news about some Congressmen opposition to slavery spread quickly and a black man Denmark Vesey who was not a slave in South Carolina delivered a speech against slavery in the African Methodist Episcopal Church of Charleston and organized a rebellion of slaves in 1822 to escape to the island of Haiti. But the rebellion had a "whistle-blower," and the organizers were killed.
Explanation:
Answer:
They can lead to the lifting of sanctions.
Explanation:
Aid doesn't help an economy.
Competing with the United States is more like a result of having a developed economy, rather than a cause of an economy developing. Plus, the United States wouldn't likely export the same things as a developing nation.
International trade agreements don't help an economy to 'grow quickly', plus this is a really general answer.
The lifting of sanctions is really important. It's hard to develop under sanctions. Trade agreements allow for the regulation, reduction and removal of sanctions. For example, if the US made a trade deal with Mexico, it would greatly help Mexico to develop, as they would now be trading more freely with the United States.
Answer:
the emergence of a two-party political system
Explanation:
THe whiskey rebellion was an uprising of farmers and destillers that were upset because of a new tax on Whiskey production that was enacted by the federal government, president Washington saw it as a potential revolution and send troops, this was seeing as a strong reaction to a protest by some farmers to which the opposition in the Republican side took advantage of and gain supporters on the protesters side, this will eventually win them office after Washington. Establishing the two-party political system.
