Answer:
True
Reason:
state agency, or a person or business that conducts business in California, that owns or licenses computerized data that includes personal information, as defined, to disclose in specified ways, any breach of the security of the data, as defined, to any resident of California whose unencrypted personal information was, or is reasonably believed to have been, acquired by an unauthorized person." In addition, the law permits delayed notification "if a law enforcement agency determines that it would impede a criminal investigation." The law also requires any entity that licenses such information to notify the owner or licensee of the information of any breach of the security of the data.
Considering the legal implication, the option that will involve a lawsuit is "<u>Material breach of contract</u>."
<h3>What is a Material breach of contract?</h3>
A <u>material breach of contract</u> is the legal term used to describe the kind of breach of contract condition or situation that would render the entire contract useless or undoable and it's punishable by law.
An excellent example of a <u>Material breach of contract</u> is when a seller has agreed to sell and collect money but later refuses to sell to the buyer again.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is option D. "<u>Material breach of contract."</u>
Learn more about Breach of contract here: brainly.com/question/1184001
Answer:
Hopefully do better than Trump
Explanation:
Answer: you should not see your go near the place it happened
Explanation:
Answer:
Yes, if California court have a long-arm statute.
Explanation:
In the context, Shirley Jones who is an entertainer files a lawsuit against a news agency, named the National Enquirer Inc. for invasion of privacy, defamation and infliction of emotional distress in the court of California.
The National Enquirer Inc. has its main business place at Florida while Shirley Jones is a resident of California. But The National Enquirer circulates about 600,000 copies of its national weekly in California.
Now, according to the Supreme Court, if a court has a long-arm statute, which refers to the jurisdiction of a court over a non resident or an defendant of an out-of-state corporation. Any state are allowed to perform this jurisdiction, if the government or the state can proved or show that the defendant have some at least minimum connection with the forum state.
