1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
gizmo_the_mogwai [7]
2 years ago
13

How did President Carter’s plan (below) for organizing the Merit Protection Board guarantee employee protection? (Select all tha

t apply.)
The Merit Protection Board will be the adjudicatory arm of the new personnel system. It will be headed by a bipartisan board of three members, appointed for 7 years, serving non-renewable overlapping terms, and removable only for cause. This structure will guarantee independent and impartial protection to employees. I also propose to create a Special Counsel to the Board, appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate, who will investigate and prosecute political abuses and merit system violations. This will help safeguard the rights of Federal employees who "blow the whistle" on violations of laws or regulations by other employees, including their supervisors.

1. The members of the board will have specific law enforcement powers to ensure their political neutrality and commitment.

2. The board will have the authority to resolve specific complaints brought before it by employees.

3. Its members serve for 7 years, assuring that no member will owe allegiance to a specific party or elected official.

4. The members of the board can only be removed from office if they violate their agreements or act in a manner that creates a legal reason for terminating them.
Law
1 answer:
Rainbow [258]2 years ago
7 0

According to the information provided, it can be inferred that Jimmy Carter made sure that the board was composed of officials in a balanced and impartial manner so that the person's election was made in a fair and meritorious manner (option 4).

<h3>What is merit?</h3>

Merit is a term that refers to the attitude, or action that makes a man worthy of reward or punishment. In principle, merit is linked to the result of good deeds that make a man worthy of appreciation. However, it can be viewed in a positive or negative.

<h3>Importance of merit in democracy</h3>

Merit is an important aspect for modern democracies because the public power is in the hands of representatives elected by the citizens. Therefore, it is assumed that the candidates and those elected to occupy public positions are thereby merits and adequate preparation to carry out those positions.

President Carter guaranteed the protection of the employees to organize the Board of Protection of Merits stating that the members of the board of directors may only be removed from their position if they breach their agreements or act in a way that generates legal cause for their termination.

According to the foregoing, it can be interpreted that the members of the board were not going to act in a corrupt manner to prevent them from being expelled from their position, which contributed to the election of personnel according to their merit (option 4).

Learn more about Jimmy Carter in: brainly.com/question/1064969

You might be interested in
Hopw does one become a justice on the supreme court
lesya [120]

The President nominates someone for a vacancy on the Court and the Senate votes to confirm the nominee, which requires a simple majority.

6 0
2 years ago
HOW DO YOU SKIP TO SEE YALL THE ANSWERS
o-na [289]
You watch the video and go to where you see your notifications and skip the video!
6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the constitution of the united states
kykrilka [37]

Answer:

The Constitution of the United States established America’s national government and fundamental laws, and guaranteed certain basic rights for its citizens. It was signed on September 17, 1787, by delegates to the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia. Under America’s first governing document, the Articles of Confederation, the national government was weak and states operated like independent countries. At the 1787 convention, delegates devised a plan for a stronger federal government with three branches—executive, legislative and judicial—along with a system of checks and balances to ensure no single branch would have too much power. The Bill of Rights were 10 amendments guaranteeing basic individual protections, such as freedom of speech and religion, that became part of the Constitution in 1791.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Discuss the effect of absence of rule of law​​
Oxana [17]

Answer:

Absence of rule of law will cause

1. conflicts in society

2. rise in criminal activities

3. loss of life and destruction of properties

Explanation:

absence of rule of law causes so many negative effects.

the effects are negative because law is absence.

1. Conflicts will rise in society wen the law in the country or place doesn't work or is not used. so people will do things they want to do anytime they like. they will commit sins and crimes which they will not be judged for or confronted for

when this happens it will lead to the second point - rise in criminal activities

armed robbers and kidnappers and other cruel people in society will put the law in there hands and do all they like. point guns at you and Rob you of all they want this will lead to the third point - loss of life and properties because when they decide to fight back den they will beat you to death or shoot you.

7 0
3 years ago
According to the ___________ doctrine, officers are permitted to search and to seize evidence, without a warrant, on private pro
Salsk061 [2.6K]

The open field doctrine states that officers are allowed to search and take evidence on private property outside of the immediate vicinity of a dwelling without obtaining a warrant.

- A "warrantless search of the area outside a property owner's curtilage" does not violate the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution, according to the open-fields doctrine (also known as the open-field doctrine or open-fields rule) in American criminal procedural law.

- Explains that as long as objects are immediately recognizable as being subject to seizure and are within the sight of an officer who is legally present in the location from where the view is made, they may be properly confiscated without a warrant (illegal).  

To know more about doctrine, kindly click on the link below :

brainly.com/question/11271619?referrer=searchResults

#SPJ4

   

7 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • In the Katz vs United States case what is the constitutional issue involved in this case
    9·1 answer
  • Can i drive to school and work with my learners permit? florida
    7·1 answer
  • Is popular sovereignty important to a republic? Why or why not?
    6·1 answer
  • Early American private banks were allowed to print paper money called bank
    13·2 answers
  • Which agency requires a college degree for employment?
    12·1 answer
  • For Biden’s and Obama’s inauguration
    14·2 answers
  • Based on a tip from a reliable informant that an attorney was illegally selling automatic weapons and ammunition from his storef
    13·1 answer
  • Who is the chief administrator of a prison?<br> A _______ is the chief administrator of a prison.
    14·1 answer
  • 30 POINTS TIMER PLS HELP PLATO CIVIS
    12·1 answer
  • It would be inefficient to have a full election every time a decision is required by the government. So the US public elects off
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!