1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
gizmo_the_mogwai [7]
2 years ago
13

How did President Carter’s plan (below) for organizing the Merit Protection Board guarantee employee protection? (Select all tha

t apply.)
The Merit Protection Board will be the adjudicatory arm of the new personnel system. It will be headed by a bipartisan board of three members, appointed for 7 years, serving non-renewable overlapping terms, and removable only for cause. This structure will guarantee independent and impartial protection to employees. I also propose to create a Special Counsel to the Board, appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate, who will investigate and prosecute political abuses and merit system violations. This will help safeguard the rights of Federal employees who "blow the whistle" on violations of laws or regulations by other employees, including their supervisors.

1. The members of the board will have specific law enforcement powers to ensure their political neutrality and commitment.

2. The board will have the authority to resolve specific complaints brought before it by employees.

3. Its members serve for 7 years, assuring that no member will owe allegiance to a specific party or elected official.

4. The members of the board can only be removed from office if they violate their agreements or act in a manner that creates a legal reason for terminating them.
Law
1 answer:
Rainbow [258]2 years ago
7 0

According to the information provided, it can be inferred that Jimmy Carter made sure that the board was composed of officials in a balanced and impartial manner so that the person's election was made in a fair and meritorious manner (option 4).

<h3>What is merit?</h3>

Merit is a term that refers to the attitude, or action that makes a man worthy of reward or punishment. In principle, merit is linked to the result of good deeds that make a man worthy of appreciation. However, it can be viewed in a positive or negative.

<h3>Importance of merit in democracy</h3>

Merit is an important aspect for modern democracies because the public power is in the hands of representatives elected by the citizens. Therefore, it is assumed that the candidates and those elected to occupy public positions are thereby merits and adequate preparation to carry out those positions.

President Carter guaranteed the protection of the employees to organize the Board of Protection of Merits stating that the members of the board of directors may only be removed from their position if they breach their agreements or act in a way that generates legal cause for their termination.

According to the foregoing, it can be interpreted that the members of the board were not going to act in a corrupt manner to prevent them from being expelled from their position, which contributed to the election of personnel according to their merit (option 4).

Learn more about Jimmy Carter in: brainly.com/question/1064969

You might be interested in
What is an international agreement that requires senate approval
poizon [28]
An international agreement that requires senate approval is a treaty.
8 0
3 years ago
“ to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers” - US constitution artic
RUDIKE [14]

The given quote is also known as the elastic clause because it gives Congress flexibility in the types of legislation that passes .

Answer: Option C  

<u>Explanation: </u>

Clause 18 of Section 8 of Article 1 of U.S. Constitution is also known as the ‘general clause’ or ‘elastic clause’ or ‘sweeping clause’ because it gives the legislature the power to make new legislation for exercising the powers provided in clause 1-17 of the Article.  

This clause act as a residuary power and comes to the aid of the Congress when any specific power is not bestowed under clause 1-17 but it is necessary to make law on the matter in order to exercise any power mentioned in preceding clauses.

3 0
4 years ago
The law making process is similar in the House and Senate with slight
lina2011 [118]

Answer:

Both houses must accept the bill

Explanation:

Before a bill can be passed on to the president to either veto or pass, it must first be approved by both the House and the Senate. The houses generally hash out their differences, rewrite the bill, and provide the final draft to the president who can then either veto the bill or pass it. There are also other ways in which a bill can be passed if the president vetoes it. For example, the chamber that originated the legislation can attempt to override the veto by a vote of two-thirds of those present.

6 0
3 years ago
These courts derive their power from the constitution and federal laws. True or False
PolarNik [594]
The answer is true because without the constitution no branch of the gov would have power actually
3 0
3 years ago
What evidence could be given to show that the executive branch is more powerful today than originally intended in the constituti
Artist 52 [7]
When the writers of the Constitution were initially deciding what powers and responsibilities the executive branch—headed by the president—would have, they were heavily influenced by their experience with the British government under King George III. Having seen how the king and other European monarchs tended to abuse their powers, the designers of the Constitution wanted to place strict limits on the power that the president would have. At the same time, they wanted to give the president enough power to conduct foreign policy and to run the federal government efficiently without being hampered by the squabbling of legislators from individual states. In other words, the Framers wanted to design an executive office that would provide effective and coherent leadership but that could never become a tyranny.

Read more: Executive Branch - The Executive Branch And The Constitution - President, Power, Powers, and Framers - JRank Articles https://law.jrank.org/pages/6652/Executive-Branch-Executive-Branch-Constitution.html#ixzz6rIgGN7y3
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following is not a characteristic of a government?
    9·1 answer
  • True or False: How quickly other drugs reach the bloodstream varies depending upon how the drug is put into the system and the t
    11·1 answer
  • Help please. make a creative piece of work on the equality act. Will give brainliest
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following is an example of an interest group?
    5·1 answer
  • A John Hopkins study showed that the states with the strictest graduated licensing requirements have a 20% decrease in teen fata
    5·1 answer
  • What form of democracy elects a small group to represent the overall will of the people?
    7·1 answer
  • Why are police officers often reluctant to get mental health counseling, and how are police departments attempting to make it ea
    15·1 answer
  • 2. Depressants are very similar to the effects of alcohol.<br> A. True<br> B. False
    13·1 answer
  • Public figures: Group of answer choices can never have an action in defamation. lose their defamation action rights if the remar
    5·1 answer
  • What basis for loan discharge can be used against ashford university for borrower defense
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!