1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
gizmo_the_mogwai [7]
2 years ago
13

How did President Carter’s plan (below) for organizing the Merit Protection Board guarantee employee protection? (Select all tha

t apply.)
The Merit Protection Board will be the adjudicatory arm of the new personnel system. It will be headed by a bipartisan board of three members, appointed for 7 years, serving non-renewable overlapping terms, and removable only for cause. This structure will guarantee independent and impartial protection to employees. I also propose to create a Special Counsel to the Board, appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate, who will investigate and prosecute political abuses and merit system violations. This will help safeguard the rights of Federal employees who "blow the whistle" on violations of laws or regulations by other employees, including their supervisors.

1. The members of the board will have specific law enforcement powers to ensure their political neutrality and commitment.

2. The board will have the authority to resolve specific complaints brought before it by employees.

3. Its members serve for 7 years, assuring that no member will owe allegiance to a specific party or elected official.

4. The members of the board can only be removed from office if they violate their agreements or act in a manner that creates a legal reason for terminating them.
Law
1 answer:
Rainbow [258]2 years ago
7 0

According to the information provided, it can be inferred that Jimmy Carter made sure that the board was composed of officials in a balanced and impartial manner so that the person's election was made in a fair and meritorious manner (option 4).

<h3>What is merit?</h3>

Merit is a term that refers to the attitude, or action that makes a man worthy of reward or punishment. In principle, merit is linked to the result of good deeds that make a man worthy of appreciation. However, it can be viewed in a positive or negative.

<h3>Importance of merit in democracy</h3>

Merit is an important aspect for modern democracies because the public power is in the hands of representatives elected by the citizens. Therefore, it is assumed that the candidates and those elected to occupy public positions are thereby merits and adequate preparation to carry out those positions.

President Carter guaranteed the protection of the employees to organize the Board of Protection of Merits stating that the members of the board of directors may only be removed from their position if they breach their agreements or act in a way that generates legal cause for their termination.

According to the foregoing, it can be interpreted that the members of the board were not going to act in a corrupt manner to prevent them from being expelled from their position, which contributed to the election of personnel according to their merit (option 4).

Learn more about Jimmy Carter in: brainly.com/question/1064969

You might be interested in
HELP!! If anyone knows anything about OJ Simpson can you please comment or something I need loadsss of help for my forensic scie
murzikaleks [220]

Answer:

dude was a football player and ran from the cops once he killed someone thats all i know.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
She sells seashells on a seashore
fredd [130]
I would do B but i don’t know
4 0
2 years ago
The form of due process requires laws to be carried out in a fair and orderly manner.
Shtirlitz [24]

Answer:

1)-Form in which trials are conducted, heard and judged or acts of forced execution carried out. 2. Set of rules that must be respected for the recognition of certain rights or the settlement of certain legal situations (inheritance, partitions, licitations, etc.).

2)-Due process, due process. In this sense, the procedure will aim to guarantee the fairness of the justice system without touching the merits of the law. It is in this perspective that the distinction is drawn between the rules of procedure - the rules of form - and the substantive rules.

Explanation:

these are all forms of laws but they apply differently.

4 0
2 years ago
What are 3 ways in which a legal duty to act arises?​
tatuchka [14]

Explanation:THEY DEPORTED ME FROM MY HOME

3 0
2 years ago
In 2014, of fatal traffic accidents<br> involved alcohol.<br><br> 7%<br> 56%<br> 22%<br> 31%
barxatty [35]

Answer:

The answer is 31%.

Explanation:

Hope that helped! :)

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • ___________ was a strength of the articles of confederation that the constitution retained
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following types of government is practiced in the United States?
    8·2 answers
  • That's the least I can do after letting the patron leave the bar so drunk last night. The statement that the patron was drunk wh
    10·1 answer
  • Gm everybody <br> What is one strength and one weakness of the Police Commission Model?
    13·1 answer
  • This is a Criminal Justice question.
    13·1 answer
  • Substantively, is there a difference between an agency rule and a legal statute?
    5·1 answer
  • This regulation opens meetings to the public.
    6·1 answer
  • What is an illegal absence
    5·1 answer
  • 10. If a petition for registration removal is denied by the court, how long must the offender wait to
    11·1 answer
  • What factors influence the supreme court’s decision-making practices?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!