Prior restraint, a kind of censorship, allows the government to review the content of printed materials and restrict their distribution.
- Most scholars believe that the First Amendment's guarantee of press freedom includes a prohibition on earlier restraints. The government may put restrictions on speech that make it harder for it to occur or outright prohibit public circulation of media. Prior constraint might be anything as innocent-seeming as a local rule limiting where newspapers can be sold.
- Prior constraint, also known as prior censorship or pre-publication censorship, is restriction of expression that forbids specific forms of expression and is typically applied by a government or organisation.
Thus this is the meaning of prior restraint.
Refer here to learn more about prior restraint: brainly.com/question/1143665
#SPJ4
In the Declaration of Sentiments, wrote by Elizabeth Stanton and Lucretia Mott for the Seneca Falls Women´s Rights Convention in 1848, some the rhetorical features were used I order to convey the ideas of the inequality of rights between men and women and the oppression women suffered by men. In these lines those features were Arrangement, because it was structured as a list, been clear and easy to internalize, Style that as the structure influences in the way people will receive the information, and, finally, Memory, seen on the repetition of the oppression idea reiterated in each sentence beginning with “He has…” to emphasize men oppressive behavior.
Answer:
C) subject of a sentence
Explanation:A small request will u please subscribe my channel? Please! U don't have to mark it Brainliest or say thanks or even vote.
Just search in you tube #TheEnglishTube Remember the one with a graduation cap on it is the channel. Please I would be honoured.
<h3 />
The conclusion is that in the end the park will be built even tough it is not in everybody's agenda. Some people, following Samara's proposal, are convinced of the benefits that the park would bring and work towards its construction, trying to share their point of view with other members of the community. The fact is that no one is actually against the park, parties who do not explicitly support it are just indiferent.
Therefore, there will be no opposition but only preassure made by park supporters so it will be built.
