The question above is one of about the psychology of trust.
According to psychologists, people who find it hard to trust others usually themselves can't be trusted.
Some of the signs that a person has trust issues are:
- they make people seem like they are capable of exhibiting the very action that they are capable of: This entails accusing others of behaviors that they themselves are exhibiting or thinking of carrying out;
- They breach confidentiality: It is easy to see from the comment that the person speaking is most likely prone to breach confidentiality. If a person has refused to help another, the question is, how is that related to whether or not they are trustworthy?
So a person who is more likely to say that you can't trust another person may themselves be unworthy of trust.
Read more about Trust here:
brainly.com/question/6014670
the answer is c good luck mate
We need information so we know wrong from right. We also use information to make decisions and judgment calls. We use signs, common sense, or research via internet or books, etc.
I hope this helped and I would greatly appreciate if you could mark me as brainliest. Thank you, have a good day (:
<span>Im pretty sure the answer would be B. Hope that helps.
</span>
Answer: Sanger Rainsford with the love of hunting, used to chasing wild diversion. By the time he was stranded in Zaroff's island, he stops to be a hunter and turns into the hunted. This change everything that Rainsford knew before. He couldn't believe that he will become a prey his entire life. Rainsford swings to his own particular chasing abilities as ingrained instincts. He starts to acquire gratefulness for the equivocation of the creatures he hunted, and what the hunt is about from both viewpoints. Particularly when he begins turning the tables on General Zaroff. At the point when Rainsford, in the end, wins the "diversion," he is just about finished with "amusement" chasing.
Explanation:
