The New Deal tried to stabilize agriculture by implementing the AAA. The AAA (Agricultural Adjustment Act) paid farmers not to make more of their crops. Franklin D. Roosevelt did this because farmers had created a surplus of goods, meaning they had produced more goods than consumers wanted to buy. This surplus lead to a sharp decline in price. By stopping the farmers from farming, it helped to increase the price of goods, as there would no longer be a surplus once citizens kept buying the goods.
The New Deal tried to stabilize industry by creating the National Recovery Administration (NRA). This focused on having the government and businesses work together in order to establish a code of ethics for businesses and to set prices for goods in order to stimulate the economy.
The correct answer is the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
This document was created by the United Nations in 1948. This outlines rights that all citizens have, regardless of what country they live in. This was developed as a means to ensure that people all over the world had this protected rights. It also allows the United Nations to intervene in cases where individuals are having these rights violated.
The Industrial Revolution impacted American society economically in a very positive way, since products were being produced en masse and exported and consumed at great profit. Socially, industrialization greatly helped create a middle class, because many more people were able to find employment. Politically, it put the focos on this middle class since they were now a major voitng block. And morally it led to a loss of morals since many factory owners did not care about the well-being of their workers.
Answer:
The human race will not live in peace until people and nations learn that differences dont matter. Some conflict can teach people different things. But it can get to the point of getting harmful when noone sees the others side of things. Peace will almost always eliminate injustice.
I just wrote from the heart so I hope it helped.
Explanation:
It largely depends on what city state we are talking about. People at this time didn't identify as Greeks they were Thebans, Ionians, Athenians, Thracians and so on.
Syracuse and Corinth had well developed democratic systems and many of the other city states had democratic components. Even the militaristic duel monarchy of the Spartans had some democracy. The Spartan Ephors were elected and had enough power to exile kings if desired. Let's look at the most commonly cited city state though, Athens.
Athenians utilized a direct democracy compared to Roman republic and everything would be voted upon. Who would lead the armies, what kind of trade arrangements, who the diplomatic envoys would be; pretty much everything. Romans elected specific individuals to handle regional business like a representative of the people, the senators and provincial governors.
Athens was slightly more equal then the Roman system. Under the Athenian law all free citizens technically had equal rights in the government. In Rome the Patricians, Equestrians and Plebeians had strictly defined roles both legally and legislatively.
The reverse of the above point were the inclusiveness of the two systems. Athens had draconian regulations on who qualified as a free member of the city state. Rome comparatively welcomed a large swath of people and actively sought to latinize the frontiers.
Rome had two consistent political parties. Politics would be marked by conflict between the Conservatives and the Populares. Athens comparatively had many political blocks that were constantly evolving and changing beliefs.
The most distinct difference between the system is probably the adaptability of them though. The Roman system was extremely complex, but was constantly changing and adapting to meet the changing times. The Athenian system would become bogged down as time progressed and would essentially become little more then another oligarchy towards its end.