It looks as though this essay should be an argumentative/persuasive essay. As such, there are two main ways to construct this. Knowing you should refute two points from the article, you could do this by either mentioning the opposing viewpoints first then your refutes (known as the block method), or you could do this point by point by stating an opposing viewpoint, then refuting it in the same paragraph (known as the point-by-point method). That said, here are two sample outlines assuming you mention two points:
OUTLINE 1 (Block Method)
Introduction
Body Paragraph 1
-opposing viewpoint 1
-opposing viewpoint 2
Body Paragraph 2
-your refute of opposing viewpoint 1
-your refute of opposing viewpoint 2
Conclusion
OUTLINE 2 (Point-by-Point)
Introduction
Body Paragraph 1
-opposing viewpoint 1
-your refute of opposing viewpoint 1
Body Paragraph 2
-opposing viewpoint 2
-your refute of opposing viewpoint 2
Conclusion
I’m not really sure this stuff is confusing
Answer:
D). Rule; Issue; Analysis.
Explanation:
The three correct words to complete the given statement and accomplish its meaning appropriately. The final statement reads as:
"From this analysis, a <u>rule</u> can be made as to whether or not the <u>issue</u> applies to the <u>analysis</u>."
<u>As per the IRAC(Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) method, the given laws are applied to the facts associated with the issue in order to analyse if it is applicable to the issue for bringing a resolution by reaching a conclusion</u>. Thus, the rule can be developed that if the issue justifies the analysis or application. Thus, <u>option D</u> is the correct answer.
It is A. Documents that were written in the past. It is in the past therefore part of history... (had to add some extra words to give the answer lol)
