Because they felt that women rights are a cause worth fighting for and wanted to spark the flame in female hearts.
The second one is reflecting that regardless of what people are paid…they will eventually be replaced by automated machines who are cheaper to replace/repair than people. They need no training and only software updates to keep opening smoothly. Machines don’t get sick…they don’t need down time…they don’t need days off. So they, in the long room, are worth the money to replace people.
<h2>Answer and Explanation </h2>
The laws were intended to punish the Massachusetts colonists for their resistance in the Tea Party objection in response to variations in assessment by the British to the loss of dependent assets. In Great Britain, these laws were introduced as Coercive Actions.
Parliament assessed the colonists. The colonists didn't like assessment without description. The colonists held having objections facing charges which drive to the Boston Tea Party. The British desired the colonists to send England behind for all the tea that the colonists killed during the Boston Tea Party.
In 1945, the British opened negotiations between the Congress, the League and themselves for the independence of India.
From the late-1930s, the Muslim League began viewing the Muslims as a separate-nation from the Hindus. This might have developed due to the history of tension between some Hindu and Muslim groups in the 1920s and 1930s.
