Answer:
a. the buyer’s consumer surplus for that good is maximized.
Explanation:
The consumer will purchase up to the moment at whose preference price matches the market price.
Because of the diminished return theory, the following unit (k+1) will have a lower benefit to the consumer thus, it will have purchased only if the price is lower. Therefore, it will not purchase as the market price is the same as the previous unit but the consumer benefit is lower.
Answer: No, because all of the defendant's facilities and offices are in State A.
Explanation:
Following the information given in the question, a federal district court cannot have subject matter jurisdiction over the plaintiff's action.
In this case, there's no subject matter jurisdiction by the court as theres subject matter jurisdiction when there is full diversity of citizenship, and the amount of controversy is more tha $75,000.
Increase its visibility in search results on search engines
Answer: The amount of gross margin Mazer would report if the company uses absorption costing is $1350.
Explanation:
Given that,
Mazer Manufacturing Company produced = 2,000 units of inventory
Units Sold = 1,800 units
Variable product cost = $4 per unit
Fixed manufacturing overhead cost = $2,500
Sales price of the products = $6 per unit
Fixed manufacturing cost per unit = 
= 
= $1.25 per unit
Unit Product cost under Absorption costing = Variable product cost + Fixed manufacturing cost per unit
= 4 + 1.25
= $5.25
∴ Gross margin under Absorption costing = Sales Revenue - Cost of goods sold
= Units sold × sales price - Units sold × Unit Product cost under Absorption costing
= 1800 × 6 - 1800 × 5.25
= 10800 - 9450
= $1350