1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
n200080 [17]
3 years ago
9

According to Clarence Darrow, what was at stake in the trial?

History
2 answers:
Ber [7]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

A. The fate of society

Explanation:

Correct on edg 2020

Elena-2011 [213]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

According to Clarence Darrow, civilization was at stake in the trial, and not Scopes.

Explanation:

Clarence Darrow was one of the orators in the Scopes Trial, also known as the Scopes Monkey Trial. The another orator in the case from opposition party was William Jennings Bryan.

The Scopes Trial was a case in which John T. Scopes, a teacher was accused of violating the Butler Act in Tennessee. According to this act, it was unlawful to teach evolutionary teachings in school. Clarence Darrow spoke in favor of Darrow and supported evolution.

Darrow asserted that it is not Scopes who is on trial but the civilization. So, according to Darrow, civilization was at stake in the trial.

You might be interested in
Which of the following issues did the religious right reject?
PSYCHO15rus [73]

The correct answer is - B. Abortion rights.


The religious right has always been against the abortion rights of women and they have always tried to restrict them. In their opinion it is a sin and it is against God's will, and every concealed child has to be born and given the chance to live.

Now this has always been very controversial and the majority of people in the western world don't agree with it, and there's multiple very good reasons for it:

- a woman can be raped and impregnated

- the child might be unplanned and the couple is not feeling ready both emotionally and financially to raise a child

- women have right to decide about their own bodies

- in the early stages the fetus is still not a separate functional organism but in fact is literary a parasite to the human body


5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
GIVING BRAINLIEST I ASKED LIKE 3 TIME PLZ HELP :( : Describe the following major changes in transportation. Make sure you includ
Oduvanchick [21]
Railroads made transportation of materials, supplies, etc much faster and easier. 

Canals (such as the panama canal) helped make water transportation easier and quicker. 

Roads made everyday travel easier 

5 0
3 years ago
Irrigation allowed farms to be<br> rivers,<br> A. below<br> B. under<br> C. on<br> D. farther from
astraxan [27]

Answer:

Archaeologists also excavated a ditch for 30 feet. For thousands of years, farmers all over the world have used irrigation—diverting water from streams and rivers to water their fields. The Ancestral Puebloan people in the Four Corners region irrigated small plots of corn, bean, and squash. Mormons used this strategy in a big way.

3 0
3 years ago
Plz help
Dafna11 [192]
Try this one. It would be about you though. Alright?  <span>My life in Pennsylvania. I got the chance to maintain a friendly relation with some of the local American Indians.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Question 6(Multiple Choice Worth 4 points) The Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. Arizona that people
kirza4 [7]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Unfortunately, you forgot to include the options for this question,

However, trying to help you, we can answer based on our knowledge of this topic.

The Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. Arizona that people "that are under arrest must be read their rights by law enforcement."

We are talking about the Supreme Court case in which the Warren Court dealt with the rights of the accused: Miranda v. Arizona.

Miranda v. Arizona was a case decided by the Warren court on June 13, 1966. Ernesto Miranda had a written confession for kidnap and r*pe, but the issue was that police interrogated him without the presence of a lawyer, neither the police officers told him he had the right to call a lawyer.

The Court's decision favored Miranda, overturned his conviction and the case was sent to Arizona for retrial.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the main idea of this passage
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following did not lower the price of newspaper publishing
    14·1 answer
  • What were the goals of the KKK during Reconstruction?
    9·1 answer
  • Describe the impact that Pericles had on Greece. Name one lasting contribution from this time
    7·1 answer
  • The fifth amendment relates to<br><br><br><br> Can one y’all answer please
    10·2 answers
  • The main religion of the Roman republic?
    5·1 answer
  • Escribe en el Cuaderno de apuntes tu opinión sobre este concepto de democracia
    8·1 answer
  • Kookaburra interesting facts
    7·2 answers
  • What do you think Gillary's depiction of the British and Chinese?
    7·1 answer
  • Question 2 (Multiple Choice Worth 3 points)
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!