Answer:
f8gogohohogifufur8tig9gogohohohogew6e64748585585858585885859585959595
Given that the surface area of the sphere is S(x)=4πx², the inverse function will be obtain as follows: make x the subject of the function
S(x)/(4π)=x²
get the square root of both sides:
x=√[S(x)/(4π)]
replace x by S⁻¹(x) and S(x) by x
this will give us the inverse as :
S⁻¹(x)=√[x/(4π)]
The above implies that the inverse is the square root of the radius divided by 4π
You shoulda just paid attention to class my guy, nobody can answer this.
Answer:
I pick the reasoning of option A
Step-by-step explanation:
I like the reasoning given in B, however, there are many cases of Athletes that, after reaching the top, maintain supremacy and improve over the years, adapting to their old age. Usually speed and physical resistance are replaced by technique and experience in the case of the top athletes.
I dont like C and D argument too much because being the best in a sport doesnt mean either that you reach the maximum level possible (in many cases you can keep growing) or that you dont have more motivations. Many athletes are super competitive people and they try to improve themselves all the time to reach, and stay, in the top.
I choose option A as answer because people on the cover doesnt neccesarily mean that they are the absolute best. Their performance was way better than their usual performance, and that may be due to either real skill growth, heavy training or a lucky streak. If it is a lucky streak, it is natural for that player's performance to go down into more terrenal levels for him. On the other hand, If he trained heavily, then he might have big injuries on later seasons and his performance wont be able to keep up for long. Thats why 'surprises' (that also sell better due to be a novelty) tend to go downhill after they reach the cover of sports illustrated.
Answer:
D
Step-by-step explanation:
Let me know if it's correct
