Answer:
$21,000
Explanation:
Given;
net change in cash = $50,000
net cash provided by investing = $5,000
net cash provided financing activities = $14,000
net change in cash = net cash provided by operating + net cash provided by investing + net cash provided financing activities
50000 = net cash provided by operating + 5000 + 14000
net cash provided by operating = 50000 - 5000 - 14000
= 21000
net cash provided by operating is $21,000
Answer:
i dont know, but what i do know is that i miss you. Im sorry and i've said it a million times and i've gotten to the point, that i dont think you love me anymore, i know it hurt, im sorry, but i will never do something like that again, ever. im sorry Jose, please talk to me. I LOVE YOU. I havent ever loved anyone as much as i love you. You give me butterflys 24/7 no matter what we're talking about. It's killing me right now knowing that you're hurting and i can't do anything about it. Please Jose come back to me.
Explanation:
Answer:
D. is essentially the same in all country markets where it competes but it may nonetheless give local managers room to make minor variations where necessary to better satisfy local buyers and to better match local market conditions.
Explanation:
A think global act local is a strategic business approach or concept which is aimed at achieving a low cost, effective cost, efficiency and focused strategy theme in all the locations where the firm has its operations but nonetheless avails local managers the opportunity and ability to adjust product
specifications, distribution and marketing channels to better satisfy local consumers, as well as effectively and efficiently match local market conditions.
Hence, the competitive strategy of a firm pursuing a "think global, act local" approach to strategy-making is essentially the same in all country markets where it competes but it may nonetheless give local managers room to make minor variations where necessary to better satisfy local buyers and to better match local market conditions.
Answer:
C. A risk averse investor would choose the economy in which stock returns are independent because risk can be diversified away in a large portfolio.
Explanation:
if stock prices move together, (positive correlation), the volatility of the portfolio will be higher. Higher volatility means higher risk. This is the case with the first economy.
In the second economy however, the stocks are independent of each other meaning there is zero correlation between stocks and hence the portfolio volatility will be much lesser.
As a risk-averse investor you will prefer the portfolio with lower volatility for the same expected return.
