Answer:
Rationalisation
Explanation:
Rationalisation is the attempt by an individual to justify an action, behaviour, or attitude with logical reasoning. Mostly the reasons given are not appropriate enough.
In the given instance Jake is accused of stealing food products from the store, he justifies his act by claiming that his monthly pay is not sufficient to support his family of five members.
This is not enough reason to still but he still tries to rationalise his action based on his low salary.
Answer: When the switch is closed.
Explanation: The current is the flow of charges, the current can only flow when the switch is closed
Answer:
The cash award will be equal;l to $444422.01
Explanation:
We have given amount invested P = $440000
Rate of interest r = 8.3%
Time t = 1 year
As the amount is compounded on daily basis
We know that 1 year = 365 days
So rate of interest 
%
Time period n = 365
We know that final amount is equal to 
So 
$
So the cash award will be equal;l to $444422.01
Answer:
export import net export
1. increases unchanged increases
2. unchanged increases decreases
3. unchanged increases decreases
4. unchanged increases decreases
5. increases unchanged increases
Explanation:
export would comprise of goods and services produced in the US that are been sold to foreign countries
Import would comprise of foreign produced goods and services that are been sold in the US
Net export would increase when export occurs and decrease when import occurs
Net export = exports – imports
When the French historian visits the US museum and the European family visits Disney, they are enjoying US services, thus export increases and net export increases
The purchase of books from Cambridge in UK, Panasonic camera and the visit to Japan constitutes import. These increases import and reduces net export
Answer:
a. Whataburger is not using the optimal cost-minimizaing mix of cashier and kiosks.
b. Whataburger should hire more cashier and rent fewer kiosks in order to improve its mix of inputs and minimize the cost
Explanation:
a. According to the given data we have the following:
Let "C" is a cashier.
"K" is a kiosk
MPC = 48 (Marginal Product of Cashier)
MPK = 32 (Marginal Product of Kiosk)
PC = $15 (cashier can be hired for a wage of $15)
PK = $12 (Kiosk rents for $12)
At optimal cost minimization point, (MPC / MPK) = (PC / PK)
(MPC / PC) = (MPK / PK)
(MPC / PC) = (48 / 15) = 3.2
(MPK / PK) = (32 / 12) = 2.67
Since the (MPC / PC) and (MPK / PK) is not equal. It implies Whataburger is not using the optimal cost-minimizaing mix of cashier and kiosks.
b. We have to use the following:
(MPC / PC) > (MPK / PK)
i.e., 3.2 > 2.67
It means Whataburger hire more cashier and rent fewer kiosks in order to improve its mix of inputs and minimize the cost.
