Well after the war Great Britain gained all of Canada which then made it possible for more of the fur trade to help ecenomiccly the colonies because you know no more taxes to pay to get into french colony lands and better access through the lake/river ports but when the revolutinary war happens it affected it when British could land troops over there then marching down with more armys (thank god for gurilla warfare am i right) but yea thats pretty much it more trade no taxes with going into the land more monoply on the fur trade and no more pesky french (no offence)
Answer:
The case referred to in the question is Dred Scott v. Sandford.
Explanation:
Dred Scott was an eslaved man from Virginia who worked for a few years in Huntsville, Alabama. Years later he was taken by his owners to the Missouri territory.
Because the most of the Missouri territory was designated as "free", when his owners tried to take him back slave territory, Dred Scott sued them arguing that having set foot in free territory, he was now a freeman.
The Supreme Court ruled against him: it ruled that black people were not citizens and could not seek the protections and rights that the U.S. constitution granted to citizens.
The answer to your question is false
violate the state constitution.
hope this helped, please mark brainliest. :)
Osama bin laden was the only person charged
