Answer: D. Updating the line of reasoning in the final paragraph to acknowledge Gallup's contrasting perspective and respond to it.
Explanation:
The options include:
Removing the quotation by Redouan Bshary because his conclusions are at odds with Gallup's
B. Changing the thesis statement to argue that the study was faulty because it did not follow Gallup's methodology
C. Incorporating Gallup's response into the first paragraph after describing his original study on Chimpanzees
D. Updating the line of reasoning in the final paragraph to acknowledge Gallup's contrasting perspective and respond to it
E. Expanding on the description of the cleaner wrasse's penchant for eating parasites off other fish.
The change that the writer will need to make in order for this new information to work in the context of the overall argument the writer is making is to update the line of reasoning in the final paragraph to acknowledge Gallup's contrasting perspective and respond to it.
When this is done, it should be reliable to the readers which can be done by supporting the statement with facts.
The answer is D. as jake was reading the email from June yet again, the flight attendant coughed gently to get his attention
Answer:
The woman, who is a devoted novelist, is catholic in her interests.
Explanation:
Answer:
Pro: The grip
Con: The Camera's speed
Explanation:
The grip shows the benefits and the speed shows the bad side
<span>It would cost excessively numerous American lives. Supporters of the nuclear bomb contended against the possibility that the US ought not utilize the bomb against Japan by taking note of that firebombing had just caused broad harm in Japan. The new Japanese constitution after World War II contained a condition that kept Japan from having or utilizing an armed force.</span>
