The answer to choose: A) Carter was instrumental in negotiating the Camp David Accords, which directly led to the 1979 Egypt-Israeli Peace Treaty.
Details:
Thanks to the persistent efforts of President Carter in working with Egyptian President Anwar Sadat and Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin, those two leaers signed the Camp David Accords in September, 1978. That led to the 1979 peace treaty between Egypt and Israel that has lasted to the present day. Sadat and Begin were awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1978 for their efforts in reaching the agreement that they made.
As to the other answers:
The fact that Carter allowed the deposed shah of Iran to come into the USA for medical treatment did provoke the hostage seizure in Tehran. However, that was not a major <u>success</u> of Carter's foreign policy, but a major mistake. (His advisors had tried to tell him in advance that letting the shah come into the US was a bad idea.)
Similarly, the increase of tensions with the Soviet Union over the Olympics would not be an example of a success.
The federal law regarding cleaning up hazardous waste would be a success item, but one of <u>domestic</u> policy, not foreign policy.
Both Wilson and Roosevelt raised the ire of big business with a series of a major regulatory reforms. Roosevelt famous policy of "trust-busting" broke up major railroad, oil and steel conglomerates, according to the National Park Service.
Hello!
During the Great Depression, it was difficult for all races/social classes to find work. Unemployment rates were high and the economy was close to collapsing. Although all races and genders had a hard time finding work, unemployment rates for African Americans were higher than unemployment rates for whites. African Americans were discriminated against and their unemployment rate was nearly 20% higher than white workers.
The correct answer to your question is D: Unemployment rates among African Americans were higher than unemployment rates among whites.
I hope this answers your question!
To stop Germany from taking over the world and to keep them from destroying our shipping
Answer:
Yes, the Bill of Rights does protect this.
Explanation:
This is protected under the First Amendment, specifically the "...the right of the people peaceably to assemble...". The First Amendment protects all speech, unless it is threatening violence on another person, as well as any peaceful protests.
There are a few important details that seal the deal when it comes to the Bill of Rights protection. First, they have set up the demonstration <u>outside the school</u>, on public land. If it was on private land, that land owner can lawfully ask them to leave the premises and press charges if they don't. Second, <u>they were peaceful in their actions</u>, making personal speeches about the teacher. The second that protest becomes violent (turning into a riot), they would be removed and their message would lose all of its ground.
So both of these conditions helps the First Amendment create a very strong wall of protection around their case, that is unless the city decides to come and fine them for not having a protesting permit... ;)
Amendment I:
<em>"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."</em>
