Answer:
1.Popular Sovereignty. The principle of popular sovereignty was the basis for every new State constitution.
2.The major features of the articles of confederation were the establishment of the confederation as 'The United States of America', and an explanation of the rights possessed by any state and the amount of power that the state were entitled to.
3.The Federalists wanted to replace the Articles of Confederation because they believed that the structure the Articles laid out did not provide enough power for the federal (or national) government to effectively solve problems.
4.Anti-Federalists argued that the Constitution gave too much power to the federal government, while taking too much power away from state and local governments. Many felt that the federal government would be too far removed to represent the average citizen.
What was true of Federalists?
They believed the national government should be stronger than the states. Therefore, your answer is A.
_________________________________________________
➶Federalists believed in a strong national government and weaker state government.
➶Anti-federalists believed in a strong state government and weaker national government. They supported the voice of smaller states and the rights of people.
Here is a list of few federalists and anti-federalists:
Federalists
➶Thomas Jefferson
➶Alexander Hamilton
➶George Washington
➶James Madison
➶John Jay
Anti-Federalists
➶Patrick Henry
➶George Mason
B. Slave trading was ended in the District of Columbia
Edge 2020
One of the most effective tools utilized by management was the introduction of scabs or replacement works. The purpose of any strikes is to destabilize the work regimen in a plant or factory to obtain concessions from management. Scabs disrupt this process by crossing picket lines and continuing the work process. In this way, the strike is essentially undermined. Moreover, the striking workers were not allowed to return and thus forfeited their jobs.
Which is based on the Supremacy Clause, federal law preempts state law, even when the laws conflict. Thus, a federal court may require a state to stop certain behavior it believes interferes with, or is in conflict with, federal law.
