1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
seropon [69]
3 years ago
13

What were the reasons for william's victory at the battle of hasting

History
1 answer:
Sloan [31]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

William was victorious at the Battle of Hastings due to his excellent leadership skills. Harold and his army because Harold made some mistakes. William won the Battle of Hastings because of his superior strategy and tactics.

You might be interested in
Yahoo~~! Milkbread or Ramen?
Olegator [25]

Answer:

I've never had milk bread so Ramen I guess

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
By the end of 1936, the supreme court had proven itself ___________ of roosevelt's new deal.
Anika [276]

____________________________________________________

Answer:

Your answer would be "an enemy."

____________________________________________________

By the end of 1936, the supreme court had proven itself an enemy of Roosevelt's new deal.

____________________________________________________

Roosevelt's new deal:

Roosevelt's new deal was an Economic program consisting of  programs, regulations, financial reforms, and public workshops made by President Roosevelt to give relief to the citizens because of the Great Depression.

____________________________________________________

Explanation:

The reason why "an enemy" would be your answer is because the Supreme Court was against what President Roosevelt was doing. They believed that what President Roosevelt was doing was giving the powers that the federal government had and giving them to the state governments. They didn't like this because the wanted to federal government to have more power than the state governments, but President Roosevelt was trying to do otherwise. The federal government said that this was unconstitutional, and that president Roosevelt was being unconstitutional. They criticized President Roosevelt a lot for "not helping the poor" enough. They said that the New Deal was just another way of saying "Share our wealth." They didn't want to share their wealth with others, they wanted to keep the wealth to themselves. Roosevelt wanted to avoid confrontation with the Supreme Court, but he couldn't do that. He just had to stick to his plan on making the country back together again after a huge tragedy that changed the whole nation. This showed that the Supreme Court was against the new deal, and was the enemy.

____________________________________________________

-Julie

6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
2- What is Strategic and Organic Activism?
kirill115 [55]

<u>Strategic and Organic Activism:</u>

Strategic activism refers to highly planned involvement that demands nothing else but only the necessary input to be brought into operation to fetch the desired output. On the other hand, organic activism refers to the use of conventional means and methods without putting much emphasis on expected results.

In order to strictly bring about the desired results, it is mandatory to have a strategic plan about what is to be done to achieve only what is wanted. Thus, when an individual or an institution sticks to the plan and operates accordingly, it is referred to as strategic activism. Organic activism, on the contrary, is simply logrolling to get hold of whatever the result is.

6 0
3 years ago
How did EIC alter mughal history
zysi [14]

Answer:

Explanation:

The EIC called them 'British naval power' and 'crown troops' stationed in India. With many military advantages on their side, EIC became a powerful player in the local polity as it was involved in local disputes. The Mughals, taking stock of the British fortifying Calcutta's Fort William, attacked them.

In 1772, under Warren Hastings, the East India Company took over revenue collection directly in the Bengal Presidency (then Bengal and Bihar), establishing a Board of Revenue with offices in Calcutta and Patna, and moving the pre-existing Mughal revenue records from Murshidabad to Calcutta.

plz mark as brainliest

5 0
4 years ago
How did the debate over states rights contribute to the outbreak of war?
marysya [2.9K]

Answer:

States' Rights refers To the struggle between the federal government and individual states over political power. In the Civil War era, this struggle focused heavily on the institution of slavery and whether the federal government had the right to regulate or even abolish slavery within an individual state.

Explanation:

The Civil War is believed by most to be caused because of the issue of slavery. ... States' rights were simply a convenient political debate to fit the slavery argument into. The American Civil War was, ultimately, about one thing: slavery. However, other issues found their way into the debate as well.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Was the Spanish-American War more positive or negative for the United States?
    14·1 answer
  • List one state that you cannot drive to<br>from Arkansas.​
    10·2 answers
  • Where is the highest population likely found?
    8·2 answers
  • Which of the following is not a true statement about the writings of Alfred Thayer Mahan?
    6·1 answer
  • 3. What was the purpose of the Monroe Doctrine? How does it still influence American foreign policy today?
    15·1 answer
  • The federal government's ability to draft people into the army is:
    14·1 answer
  • What was considered the worst humiliation for the U.S during the war of 1812
    8·1 answer
  • What do you think President Obama means when he
    6·2 answers
  • Did women in shakespeare england have the sane rughts as wimen in other parts of the world.
    10·1 answer
  • Who’s power in the senate is most similar to the power of the speaker of the house
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!