1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mr_godi [17]
3 years ago
11

Over thousands of years, countries have safeguarded their citizens by doing all of the following except

History
1 answer:
Amanda [17]3 years ago
8 0

Probably 1, however I can see why that would be a tiny bit confusing.

Building walls protects from incoming invaders(at least back in the day), creating armies, makes a force to go and fight to protect the people, and what was the other one? Oh yea, moving to a safer place.

Doing that would mean making invasions less likely, and making your people feel and be safer.

Hope this helps.

You might be interested in
Which best explains charles I's actions after parliament refused him war funds
maxonik [38]
He dissolved Parliament.
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I NEED HELP 10 POINTS!!
rewona [7]

Answer:

E & B

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
How were nuclear weapons viewed by Americans during the cold war?
skad [1K]

During the Cold War, and in the past decade, U.S. policy often viewed nuclear weapons apart from the rest of the U.S. military establishment, with nuclear weapons serving to deter a global nuclear conflict with the Soviet Union or Russia.

6 0
2 years ago
Why do you think that there was an engagement of early Filipinos in riddles?
AleksandrR [38]

Answer:

Riddles were originally a form of oral literature, rather than written down, so think of how the riddle sounds when you say it. Try not to bog down your riddle with elaborate words or abstract concepts.

7 0
2 years ago
Affirmative action was a new approach to dealing with discrimination in the 1960s. however, the courts have sent mixed messages
irinina [24]
The correct answer is <span>Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Peña

In this case, the supreme court decided that even in such cases it could be unconstitutional and that each individual case there should be a process of strict scrutiny of the events, which is the most strict way of observing something and the most thorough. The case was related to to both the analysis of the 14th and the 5th amendment.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did the Allies land on the beaches of Normandy on D-Day? (5 points)
    5·2 answers
  • How does the video show multiple perspectives?
    12·2 answers
  • Why did the Allies agree to focus on Europe before Asia during World War II?
    6·1 answer
  • Reports by The New York Sun revealed the corruption of the Crédit Mobilier construction company.
    14·1 answer
  • What did John locke’s ideas contribute to the American Revolution?
    5·2 answers
  • An effect of the Dawes Act was that American Indians:
    11·2 answers
  • The main debate between the North and South in the years leading up to the Civil War was over A.
    6·1 answer
  • How does this cartoon apply to the events of the Cold War what were the outcomes of those incidents?
    9·1 answer
  • What’s the best definition of Columbia’s exchange
    8·1 answer
  • What does this passage suggest about China under the Yuan dynasty?
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!