800-600 BC - the Upanishads wrote the sacred scripture.
500 BC - Jainism and Buddhism were founded.
<span>326 BC - <span>Alexander the Great moved into India.
</span></span><span>324 BC - <span>The Mauryan Empire was established
</span></span><span>272 BC - <span>Ashoka, the grandson of Chandragupta Maurya, becomes the emperor of India.
</span></span><span>185 BC - <span>The Maurya Empire ended.
</span></span><span>1500's - <span>Christianity was introduced to India by the Europeans and in the early 1500's Sikhism was founded by Nana.
</span></span><span>1600 - <span>Queen Elizabeth I granted a charter to the East India Company established trading posts in Bombay, Calcutta, and Madras
</span></span><span>1857 - <span>The Sepoy Rebellion
</span></span><span>1914 - 1918 - <span>World War 1
</span></span><span>1945 - <span>August: World War II ended when United States dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki
</span></span><span>1947 - <span>British and Indian leaders agreed to divide the country into India and Pakistan, 15 August 1947 India became independent.
</span></span><span>1948 - <span>30 January: Gandhi was assassinated
</span></span><span>1950 - <span>26 January: A new Indian Constitution was ratified and Jawaharlal Nehru became the Indian first prime minister</span></span>
The detail from the passage that best supports the inference that Samoset's visit to the community positively changes the relationship between the colony members and the Native Americans is "<u>Being after some time of entertainment and gifts dismissed, a wjile after he came again...called Massaoit"</u>
<u />
Based on the passage, the colonists had were not able to communicate with the Indians, until Samsoet courageously came up to them and spoke broken English to them that they could understand.
After this visit, they were able to gain a lot of things from their relationship which benefitted them tremendously.
Read more here:
brainly.com/question/24419036
In my opinion, the correct answer is D. He compares the powers of the executive and legislative branches to those of the judiciary, highlighting the strengths of the former and the relative weaknesses of the latter. In Hamilton's view, the judiciary branch is the least powerful of the three. He says that it has no real power or influence over "the sword" or "the purse", which are controlled by the executive and legislative branches. It is devoid of force and will, and it can merely judge, but even that it cannot do without help from the executive branch.
