<h2>Evaluating one's contribution gets employee thinking about their performance.</h2>
Explanation:
Self-appraisal is one of the best method to assess themselves of what kind of contribution that he has made to the company to grow.
He can also look back about the opportunities that the company has given to him to perform.
This actually,
- speaks for results
- gets the chance to do peer review
- an exercise to grow in terms of career
- list out the achievements of self
- contribution done by the self
So the chosen statement supports Dylan's idea.
Whenever min. goes up, taxes increase, prices on food, goods../ are higher price, and especially gas...
Answer:
Casey would prefer option 1; that he pays the premiums ($8,000). Even if Casey cannot deduct his insurance premiums as medical expenses, his income will only be reduced by $8,000. If he decided to take option 2, his income would be reduced by $8,800 (= $10,000 - 12%), so he is saving $800 by taking option 1.
On the other hand, Jean would prefer option 2; that her salary is reduced by $10,000 and her employer pays the premiums. By choosing option 2, Jean is going to lose $6,500 (= $10,000 - 35%). If she chose option 1, her income would be reduced by $8,000, so she is saving $1,500 by choosing option 2.
Answer:
. Determine the direct materials price variance, direct materials quantity variance, and total direct materials cost variance. Enter a favorable variance as a negative number using a minus sign and an unfavorable variance as a positive number.
Explanation:
Answer:
Causal ambiguity
Explanation:
Causal Ambiguity is a situation is which it is impossible to replicate the consequences or effects of an event or thing or phenomena.
This is mostly used in the development of share prices among other things.
In the case of the question, the inability to relate the relationship between culpability and the firm's competitve advantage is why its ideas can not be imitated by any other firm.
Cheers.
