<h2>Answer is option "b"</h2>
Explanation:
- Non-ionizing radiation is radiation that has a lower frequency, or longer wavelength, in the EMR spectrum. These frequencies range from that of power lines, radios, and cell phones, up to visible light. Non-ionizing radiation is not powerful enough to break the chemical bonds in molecules. In general, it is not harmful to human health as radiation per se, but could be harmful in terms of the transfer of heat energy. An example of an emitter of non-ionizing radiation is a microwave oven.
- Non-ionizing radiation is less harmful because the rays carry much less energy. Radio waves, light, and even heat are examples of non-ionizing radiation. For the most part, these kinds of radiation do not cause any damage. However, ultraviolet light is a kind of non-ionizing radiation that can be harmful - it can cause mutations in DNA
- Non-ionizing radiation is limited to the lower energy range electromagnetic radiation, which is more commonly known as light. However, the light we can see with our eyes, visible light, is only a small section of the electromagnetic radiation spectrum as seen here
- Hence the right answer is option "b"
Answer:
a helix!
Explanation:
you can also call it a double helix
Explanation:
The photophosphorylation process which results in the movement of the electrons in a cyclic manner for synthesizing ATP molecules is called cyclic photophosphorylation. ... During cyclic photophosphorylation, the electrons are transferred back to P700 instead of moving into the NADP from the electron acceptor.
hope it helps
Mark me as brainliest
if you find helpful
:DD
The ozone layer is a protective gas around the earth which protects the planet and all the living things on it :-)
The three evidence that support the existence of plants on Antarctica are:
- Climate;
- Pollen;
- Herbivorous animals;
Apart from the plant fossils found on Antarctica, there are few other evidence that suggest that plants existed in the past on the now frozen continent. Some of those evidence for the existence of plants on Antarctica are the pollen found in the rocks and fossils of organisms, the climate records, as well as the herbivorous animals.
The pollen is only released by the plants, thus that is a sure indicator that plants were occupying this part of the world.
The climate records on Antarctica that can be seen in the rock layers, suggest that for most of its existence, Antarctica had a warm and wet climate, which is perfect conditions for the plants to thrive.
The herbivorous animals are feeding themselves on plant material, so since there's fossils of herbivores in Antarctica, it for sure is an evidence that there were plants existing in order for them to feed and be able to live in there.
