1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kaheart [24]
3 years ago
7

Refer to the passage.

History
2 answers:
Aloiza [94]3 years ago
4 0

Answer: answer is C

Explanation:

Blizzard [7]3 years ago
4 0

Answer: It is C) Russian workers lacked avenues of protest, while American workers had labor unions and political parties.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What were the differences between the two parties?
arsen [322]

Answer: The Democratic Republican Party and the Federalists

Explanation:

The Federalists wanted a strong federal government whereas the DRP defended states' rights.

They disagreed on central banking, Hamilton(Federalist) wanted to have a federal entity to control the issuing of money(a central bank) which Jefferson(DRP) strongly opposed since the power of the bankers to control monetary creation would endanger individual liberties.

They disagreed on their interpretation of the Constitution, someone like Marshall (Chief Justice of the USA, 1800-1835) defended a loose interpretation of the Constitution whereas Jefferson stood for a strict interpretation of the Constitution.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Besides enslaved Africans what was brought from the west Indies to the colonies
Fynjy0 [20]
Sickness was a big thing brought from there as we were not used to there sicknesses and we were not used to there's it's a lot like the Aztecs and the Spanish the Spanish brought small pocks
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Read the quotation, and then answer the question.
mariarad [96]

Answer:

b

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
which principal included in the Texans constitution restricts the amount of money the state government can spend?
nadya68 [22]

Answer:

The amount of money to be spent by the state governement is limited by Article III, section 49a.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is judicial restraint in deciding cases
vazorg [7]

Answer:

Judicial restraint is a theory of judicial interpretation that encourages judges to limit the exercise of their own power. It asserts that judges should hesitate to strike down laws unless they are obviously unconstitutional, though what counts as obviously unconstitutional is itself a matter of some debate.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which factor most directly contributes to the income gap in Latin American nations?
    9·2 answers
  • which of the following describes a major similarity between the Roman Catholic church and Protestant churches that formed follow
    15·2 answers
  • Why did the Russian Revolution continue even after the communist program was launched?
    13·2 answers
  • During the Han dynasty, why were merchants considered such a low class in the social structure? They were usually very poor. The
    9·2 answers
  • Describe miasma theory?
    14·1 answer
  • What abandon fort became the Choctaw capital
    12·2 answers
  • When was the last time the republicans controlled the house senate and presidency?
    15·1 answer
  • Q7: Who has the supreme power-states or national government?<br> Necessary and proper clause :
    15·1 answer
  • What made Huey Long so different from leaders who came before him?
    8·1 answer
  • What is the significance of the fact that the Bull was written in 1493?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!