Answer:
D is the answer.
Explanation:
The environment is not changing in any of these scenarios. Mark me Brainliest if you like my answer!
The correct answer is B) New York Times v. United States. It meant that prior restraint could be used only to prevent the release of information that would directly imperil the country's war effort.
The upheaval was caused by widespread discontent with the French monarchy and the poor economic policies of King Louis XVI, who met his death by guillotine, as did his wife Marie Antoinette
D looks like the best option
