Answer:
The material she created can be classified as a primary source.
Explanation:
Primary sources are documents, images or artifacts that provide firsthand testimony or direct evidence concerning an historical topic under research investigation. Primary sources are original documents created or experienced contemporaneously with the event being researched.
Hope this helps and please mark brainliest!
No, almost nothing is inevitable in history
<span>The correct answers should be to make the supplies necessary for war. The goal of it was high quality and high quantity production and allocation of goods and materials necessary for the war. This included fuel as well. It was founded in 1942, a few years before the war ended and was certainly helpful for the war effort.</span>
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Do you consider Bishop Eusebius’s account to be reliable?
No, really not.
The reason why because his account had created many controversies.
Eusebius has been known as the official historian of the church. He participated in the Council of Nice in 314, organized by Roman Emperor Constantine to revise the religious or historic documents that would end up being in the Bible.
So Eusebius based most of his comments on personal opinions and other historic document's interpretations. It is difficult to say that he did the proper research and had reliable sources. During the Nicea Council, a group of Bishops decided what documents had to be part of the Bible and which not, based on their own criteria. That is not a good indicator of the validity of the documents included, even less we can consider those as sacred.
Answer:
beading, featherwork, metalwork, painting, Silversmithing, weaving(all of the above)
Explanation:
