Answer:
D) 80%
Explanation:
IRS Section 267(c)(4) establishes that the sister will be considered as constructive owner of the stock that her family owns. Family is defined as brothers (25%), sisters, spouse, ancestors (father 40% and mother 15%), children, and grandchildren.
In this case, Farber's sister would constructively own 25% + 40% + 15% = 80% of the bank's stocks.
Sophia’s ethical obligation is to inform Pete about the mistake made in the draft of contract.
<h3>What is an ethical obligation
?</h3>
An ethical obligation refers to a moral requirement to follow a certain course of action.
Hence in this case, Sophia’s ethical obligation is to inform Pete about the mistake made in the draft of contract and correct the same.
<h3>Should she tell him about the mistake? </h3>
Yes, she should tell him because both party in a contract are expected to be transparent and disclose facts to one another.
<h3>What
Life Principles would i apply in this situation?</h3>
I will apply the life principles of transparency.
Read more about ethical obligation
<em>brainly.com/question/25891637</em>
A product that is in a high-growth market but has a low market share would be classified as a question mark on the Boston Consulting Group (BCG) matrix.
Question marks consume huge amounts of money but they do not generate a lot of cash.
Answer:
Sometimes our justice system can really surprise us. How can a person sue another individual based on arguments that are known to be false? Shouldn't the courts just say no to this kind of lawsuits?
It's plain common sense that the court would dictate that the agreement should be annulled or rescinded based on the mother's fraud attempt or maybe mutual mistake between Michael Jordan and her. Even if they were both convinced that he was the father, after it was proven that he wasn't, the court shouldn't have even wasted its time (and taxpayers money) with this case.