Answer: Revolutionary war
Explanation:
Answer:In short, the British treated their colonies in vastly different ways, both across different regions and within the same colonies over time.
The British Empire was never a consistent empire. Across various colonies, there were different raisons d’être and methods of organization for each one. Even within America, different Colonies were founded for entirely different reasons. Virginia started out as a mercantile colony run by a company; Massachusetts was originally a Puritan theocracy; New York was a crown colony taken over from the Dutch; and Maryland and Pennsylvania were religiously tolerant colonies governed by (relatively) benign hereditary feudal rulers (called proprietors), the Barons Calvert and the Penn family. South Carolina, with its rice and indigo plantations, was more akin to a Caribbean colony than its continental neighbors.* At the same time that the American Colonies were emerging, the East India Company established outposts in India, and the Royal African Company did much the same in Africa. None of them were uniformly governed or similar in character; the British government occasionally took notice but generally was not involved in their governance.
Explanation: hi ;0
The correct answer is letter D
In Japan a well-developed feudal regime flourished. It is really one of the glories of that nation to have intuited the principles of wisdom that presided over the foundations of medieval feudalism. To have intuited this in such a way that, comparing the Japanese medieval regime with the medieval regime in the West, there are similarities.
One of the characteristics inherent to the feudal regime is a certain patriarchal sense of the greatness of the feudal lord, as a father and as a protector of those who are his vassals. In the feudal conception - this must be horrifying to the ears of Catholic progressives - the terms father and sir are similar. The father is master of his children. You are the father of your vassals. You assume the full protection of your vassals and defend them against external enemies. Such defense of the vassals is up to the lord rather than the king.
It follows that some notes present in the feudal constructions of the Middle Ages are factors of security, solidity and stability. But, simultaneously, such notes reflect a certain height, a certain challenge, a certain boldness typical of a power that is continually at war. War often led to exaggeration, even against real power. This came to be greatly weakened in Japan, partly because of feudalism, just as it was, at some point in the Middle Ages, in France.
The cases mentioned are related to:
- The First Amendment (Engel v Vitale, and Tinker v. Des Moines)
- The Fourth Amendment (Mapp v. Ohio)
Mapp v. Ohio (1957): This case is related to the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution because Dollree Mapp was the victim of an illegal police search. They illegally forced the door of her house and entered without her consent.
Additionally, she was detained arbitrarily for having objects considered obscene. This case is related to the Fourth Amendment because this amendment establishes the protection of citizens against arbitrary searches and apprehensions.
On the other hand, Engel v. Vitale: This case is related to the First Amendment to the United States Constitution because it prohibits the creation of any norm that limits or prevents the free practice of freedom.
In this case, the New York State Board of Regents was violating this amendment because they approved a rule to implement prayer in public schools which affected students who did not have religious beliefs or those who did not practice Christianity.
Tinker v. Des Moines: This case is related to the First Amendment because Moines institution violates the First Amendment because some of its students were making use of their right to free expression wanted to show their rejection of the Vietnam War through a bracelet, and the school prohibited it. Based on the foregoing, it can be inferred that the institution violated the First Amendment by prohibiting free expression for students.
Learn more in: brainly.com/question/13276616
A client with lung cancer has developed an intractable, nonproductive cough that is unrelieved by nonopioid antitussive agents. The physician prescribes codeine, 10 mg by mouth every 4 hours. When discussing this medication with a nursing colleague, which statement that accurately describes codeine will the nurse include?
A. It's a centrally-acting antitussive and can cause dependence.
B. It's a peripherally-acting antitussive and can cause dependence.
C. It's a peripherally-acting antitussive and doesn't cause dependence.
D. It's a centrally-acting antitussive and doesn't cause dependence.
Answer:
A. It's a centrally-acting antitussive and can cause dependence.
Explanation:
Research has shown that codeine reduces the cough reflex, such that it affects the cough's sensitivity which is located at the middle of medulla, to the arrival of stimuli; sensitive to both mechanical and chemical stimuli. Also, because Codeine is considered to be an opoid or opiate which is used in treating pain, cough and diarrhea, it can cause dependence in the patient.
