With the regards to the statement that if not for Americans participating in WWI, Prohibition would not happen, this statement is <u>false</u>.
<h3>Why is this statement false?</h3>
The movement to enact prohibition was already growing strongly before the First World War broke out.
In fact, before the U.S. joined the war, those in support of Prohibition had majorities in the two houses of Congress. WWI was merely an event that sped up the rate of prohibition and without it, Prohibition would have still happened at a later stage.
Find out more on Prohibition at brainly.com/question/3814594.
Answer:
Black and white abolitionists in the first half of the nineteenth century waged a biracial assault against slavery. Their efforts proved to be extremely effective. Abolitionists focused attention on slavery and made it difficult to ignore. They heightened the rift that had threatened to destroy the unity of the nation even as early as the Constitutional Convention.
Although some Quakers were slaveholders, members of that religious group were among the earliest to protest the African slave trade, the perpetual bondage of its captives, and the practice of separating enslaved family members by sale to different masters.
As the nineteenth century progressed, many abolitionists united to form numerous antislavery societies. These groups sent petitions with thousands of signatures to Congress, held abolition meetings and conferences, boycotted products made with slave labor, printed mountains of literature, and gave innumerable speeches for their cause. Individual abolitionists sometimes advocated violent means for bringing slavery to an end.
Although black and white abolitionists often worked together, by the 1840s they differed in philosophy and method. While many white abolitionists focused only on slavery, black Americans tended to couple anti-slavery activities with demands for racial equality and justice.
Explanation:
Answer:
They felt an emotional attachment to Britain; they knew that the imperial connection had brought them protection; they feared that foreign aid might lead to foreign domination; and many of them were alarmed lest independence bring with it economic and social leveling.
Explanation:
Group of early Americans used and maintained natural resources of environment in a effective way. In this way a group of early Americans adapted to their environment.
In different environment people fit them to cope up with their needs by changing their livelihood pattern (hunting, gathering and fishing) region wise.
Explanation:
Native Americans were very near to the nature. They used to live in forests, grassland and on the banks of rivers. So they know it better to deal with environment and to keep the sustainability at desire level. Native Americans used natural resources at their source points (oil, natural gas).
Their livelihood pattern varies with the change of environment. They used to collect fruits and wood in dense forest. On the bank of the river fishing is the main occupation and farming and rearing practiced in grasslands.
Most states granted voting to the property owners.
