<h2> Children & Voting</h2>
Consequences and both negative and positive sides
I think children should not be allowed to vote for things such as presidents, since it's a big responsibility. But I do think, early teens and teenagers (12+) should be smart enough to elect a candidate, and predict the consequences of their election.
If I vote for a person with a dirty history, I should predict there is no reason why he/she should suddenly be a clean person.
If I vote for a person with a clean history, but that doesn't seem to be willing to do or change anything, I should be able to predict that things will remain the same, if not worse.
Even if most children that age, are responsible enough to vote, it's a huge responsibility, and the truth is, newer generations are gradually loosing interest in politics, which means they will relatively become more politically naive, affecting their decisions.
Hope it helped,
BioTeacher101
An example of the agonist substitution type of treatment for substance abuse is:
- The use of methadone to treat heroin addiction
<h3>What is agonist substitution?</h3>
Agonist substitution is the change from one effective form of medication to another that has a similar effect.
This is often the case in the treatment offered to people who suffer substance abuse. There is often a switch from a synthetic opiate to methadone which is a full agonist.
Learn more about Agonist substitution here:
brainly.com/question/13068033
#SPJ1
There are a total of Forty seven questions in the math section of the psat.
Answer: He believed God would revive Isaac.
