All categories

3 years ago

Research FedEx's dress code first to find out how the employees dress.

Business

1 answer:

Goryan [66]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

You can wear whatever to keep warm on dock. Drivers and supervision have to wear uniforms. Dock workers can wear whatever.

Tattoos are acceptable. Many employees have them and are visible.

You might be interested in

The rate of economic growth per capita in france from 1996 to 2000 was 1.9% per year, while in korea over the same period it was

bagirrra123 [75]

Answer:

36.83 years

16.85 years

$63,710.88

$ 71,490.43

Explanation:

We can use the nper formula in excel to compute the doubling time for the capital real GDP of both countries

=nper(rate,pmt,-pv,fv)

FV is the future real GDP which $28,900*2=$57,800 for France while that of Korea is $25,400 ($12,700*2)

PV is the present real GDP

rate is the economic growth rate of 4.2% in Korea and 1.9% in France

France=nper(1.9%,0,-28900,57800)= 36.83

Korea=nper(4.2%,0,-12700,25400)= 16.85

In 2045 ,which is 42 years from now the real GDP are shown thus:

=fv(rate,nper,pmt,-pv)=fv(1.9%,42,0,-28900)=$63,710.88

=fv(rate,nper,pmt,-pv)=fv(4.2%,42,0,-12700)=$ 71,490.43

3 0

3 years ago

Suppose that government officials have set an emissions tax to reduce pollution. Assume that the optimal tax would be $1,500, bu

Mariulka [41]

Answer: there will be too much pollution

Explanation:

From the question, we are informed that government officials have set an emissions tax to reduce pollution and that the optimal tax should have been $1,500 but government officials have set the tax equal to $500.

It should be noted that due to the fact that the optimal tax has been set below the equilibrium, this will lead to a rise in pollution as the people will be aware that they're paying less than the optimal level which will lead to more pollution. An increase in the optimal tax will have help in reducing the pollution.

8 0

3 years ago

Assume a firm's resources and capabilities are costly to imitate. This is because rival companies do not clearly understand the

Nana76 [90]

Answer:

True

Explanation:

A core competency refers to those unique capabilities built by an organization which are hard to imitate by rivals and which give such an organization a competitive advantage over the rivals.

A casual ambiguity refers to the state of non clarity with respect to how consequences relate to the initial state of a phenomenon.

In the case of firm, the phenomenon being the built up to core competency which the rivals are unable to decipher with respect to the relationship between the firm's resources and capabilities.

6 0

3 years ago

ABC, a chain of candy stores, purchases its candy in bulk from its suppliers. For a recent shipment, the company paid $1,500 and

spin [16.1K]

Answer: Option (d) is correct.

Explanation:

Amount paid for candy = $1,500

Items received = 8,500 pieces of candy

Group 1 = 2,500 pieces

Selling price = $0.15 each

sale value = pieces sold × Selling price

= 2,500 × $0.15 each

= $375

Group 2 = 5,500 pieces

Selling price = $0.36 each

sale value = pieces sold × Selling price

= 5,500 × $0.36 each

= $1,980

Group 3 = 500 pieces

Selling price = $0.72 each

sale value = pieces sold × Selling price

= 500 × $0.72 each

= $360

Total sale value = $375 + $1,980 + $360

= $2,715

$Percentage\ of\ sale\ in\ Group\ 2=\frac{Sale\ value}{Total\ sale\ value}\times 100$

$Percentage\ of\ sale\ in\ Group\ 2=\frac{1,980}{2,715}\times 100$

= 72.92%

Proportion of cost for Group 2 = cost × Percentage of sale in Group 2

= $1,500 × 72.92%

= $1,093.8

$cost\ per\ unit= \frac{cost}{total\ units}$

$cost\ per\ unit= \frac{1,093.8}{5,500}$

= $0.1988

= $0.20(approx)

4 0

3 years ago

According to the article by Hutchinson, Farris and Anders (2007), cash-to-cash analysis is difficult because financial data and

Margarita [4]

Answer:

False

Explanation:

"Cash-to-cash Analysis and Management" by Hutchinson, Farris and Anders talks about the availability of the financial data and computer technology in assisting a business when it comes to determining its cash-to-cash position (C2C), as well as the benchmarks needed for comparison.

Cash-to-cash analysis was difficult in the past, however, it is easier nowadays. The supply chain is even examined at a broader view than before. C2C efficiency is possible by utilizing the readily available financial date and computer technology. So, this makes the statement above as "false."

So, this explains the answer.

6 0

3 years ago